Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 7 → 10 of 114
2 categories · RankedOpenCTI
71Judge labels
2First choices
20Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Threat intel for small business buyers
Rank 12 of 119 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 32% of its 28 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of OpenCTI →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business10 of 126
2%27 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market12 of 119
2%28 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise65 of 83
0%15 labels
criticized challenger
In threat intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named OpenCTI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat intelligence platforms | Security operations | 2% | 12 of 119 | 32% | 28 | criticized challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI SOC agents | Security operations | 0% | 71 of 104 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Dropzone AI at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, OpenCTI held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Threat intel · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 6 → 11 of 111
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 15 → 32 of 78
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat intel | 6% | 2% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 12 of 119 |
| AI SOC agents | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 71 of 104, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated OpenCTI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated OpenCTI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels1
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative19 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labels1
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative21 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative71 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“OpenCTI or MISP | Completely free software, highly robust” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Threat intel · budget prompt · first choice
“Best For: Organizations wanting a modern, scalable, and highly integrable platform for structuring and operationalizing threat intelligence.” Mistral Small · Threat intel · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Dedicated CTI teams wanting a knowledge-graph-based approach ... Limitations: Moderate-to-high operational complexity” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Threat intel · comparative prompt · alternative
“OpenCTI is an open source cyber threat intelligence platform designed to organize intelligence as a connected knowledge base.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Threat intel · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“NVD describes a critical privilege-escalation issue affecting OpenCTI versions 6.6.0–6.9.12 and fixed in 6.9.13. That's a reason to avoid those unpatched versions, not to reject OpenCTI categorically.” GPT-6 Luna · Threat intel · negative prompt · soft negative
“Open source platforms such as MISP and OpenCTI ... require significant internal engineering resources to deploy, maintain, and integrate.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Threat intel · comparative prompt · soft negative
“excellent open-source options, they require significant internal administration (deployment, upgrades, access controls)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Threat intel · negative prompt · soft negative
“OpenCTI is flexible, but its connector-based model means you'll need someone to deploy, integrate, and maintain it.” GPT-6 Luna · Threat intel · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as OpenCTI, over the 71 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OpenCTI was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as OpenCTI, over the 71 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OpenCTI was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OpenCTI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 69 of the 71 answers that named OpenCTI and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
upguard.com30
vectra.ai24
underdefense.com22
g2.com21
recordedfuture.com21
analyticsinsight.net20
it-ai-index.com20
flare.io19
learn.g2.com19
breachsense.com17
213 of the 213 domain citations in answers naming OpenCTI came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
filigran.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, OpenCTI takes 2% of first choices and MISP takes 12%.ShowHide
Search and answers
filigran.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, OpenCTI takes 2% of first choices and MISP takes 12%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “threat intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “threat intelligence platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,900 a month (“opencti”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 94 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,947 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 338 · 24 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,116
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 119 in threat intel
Segment leader
12%
MISP
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 71 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 69 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on filigran.io
10,984
subdomains included
Content
256
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
10 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 167 | 10 | 2026-09-24 | SOAR, SIEM | |
| News or press | 29 | 5 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 27 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 11 | 4 | 2026-08-25 | SIEM | |
| Case study | 10 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | 1 | 2026-07-21 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | 0 | 2026-04-27 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2026-05-27 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Newsroom news or press
- 2026-09-29News archive news or press
- 2026-09-24Women in cyber threat intelligence no typical path blog
- 2026-09-24Filigrans women in cti guide challenges the typical route into cyber news or press
- 2026-09-15Filigran partners with sek news or press
- 2026-09-11Opencti and google secops soar threat intel flows both ways blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page filigran.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as OpenCTI
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as OpenCTI; a claim can dispute any of them.
OpenCTI (Open Cyber Threat Intelligence) 2OpenCTI (Open Cyber Threat Intelligence Platform) 1OpenCTI + MISP 1
Follow OpenCTI
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OpenCTI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OpenCTI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OpenCTI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where OpenCTI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name OpenCTI, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.