AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › SimpleTexting · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

SimpleTexting

5Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SimpleTexting was named 1 time in CPaaS, where Twilio led with 43%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cpaas · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SimpleTexting for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Communications APIsDeveloper platform0%43 of 710%1under 10 labels · led by Twilio at 43%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SimpleTexting yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SimpleTexting across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“SimpleTexting: Starts at $29/month. It gives you a clean, ready-to-use out-of-the-box UI” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CPaaS · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SimpleTexting, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SimpleTexting was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Twilio5 of 50Not among the top eight
Telnyx4 of 51Not among the top eight
Plivo4 of 50Not among the top eight
Bandwidth3 of 51Not among the top eight
Bird2 of 50Not among the top eight
TextMagic2 of 50Not among the top eight
Vonage Communications APIs2 of 50Not among the top eight
Secureframe1 of 51Not among the top eight
Sprinto1 of 51Not among the top eight
Vanta1 of 51Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SimpleTexting. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named SimpleTexting and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

apiscout.dev3
brilo.ai2
checkthat.ai2
g2.com2
simpletexting.comYour site2
txtimpact.com2
adtools.org1
apibenchmarks.com1
apis.io1
apistatuscheck.com1

Fifteen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming SimpleTexting came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

simpletexting.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SimpleTexting takes 0% of first choices and Twilio takes 43%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “communications api platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “communications api platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
18,100 a month (“simpletexting”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
66 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 110,549 a month
Searches its site ranks for
14,863 · 850 in the top three
Sites linking to it
6,481
Paid Google search
5 searches its ads show for, about 90 clicks and $1,355 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
108 ads · 83 text, 18 image, 7 video · 76 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2022, as Simpletexting LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 15 in the year, 93 before. 11 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 43 of 71 in cpaas
Segment leader
43%
Twilio
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
5 answers
Its own site cited
in 5 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on simpletexting.com
1,080
subdomains included
Content
759
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
64 · 72
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog49622026-08-07
Case study14622026-09-24
Report or ebook39undated
Podcast or video2802025-10-03
Comparison2412026-08-27
Glossary or explainer17undated
Webinar or virtual event4undated
Template or tool402019-12-16
Conference or event1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page simpletexting.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow SimpleTexting

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SimpleTexting is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
SMS marketing services & texting platform
For
small businesses
Price stated
Estimated monthly cost $39.00 (billed yearly at $398.40) simpletexting.com/pricing
Starting price
39 simpletexting.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Try It Free simpletexting.com
Integrations claimed
1000 simpletexting.com
Hosting
US & Canada only
Customers named
Go Amazing EnergyLions Realty GroupLone Star CollegeKing's Cross BookstoreHighsmith CPAsIdaho Nanny AgencyUnited Country Property Solutions LLCJust Roots
Not stated on the pages read
Certifications

What SimpleTexting's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: simpletexting.com, simpletexting.com/pricing, simpletexting.com/features, simpletexting.com/customers, simpletexting.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SimpleTexting's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SimpleTexting, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SimpleTexting by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where SimpleTexting is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name SimpleTexting, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at simpletexting.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.