IT AI Index

Index › Products › TextMagic · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

TextMagic

4Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

3 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. TextMagic was named 1 time in CPaaS, where Twilio led with 43%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business16 of 68

under the label threshold

Mid-market67 of 71

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In cpaas · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named TextMagic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Communications APIs	Developer platform	0%	67 of 71	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Twilio at 43%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for TextMagic yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated TextMagic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“it is noted for losing head-to-head comparisons and has a lower sentiment score” Mistral Small · CPaaS · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as TextMagic, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TextMagic was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Plivo3 of 40Not among the top eight

Bandwidth2 of 41Not among the top eight

SimpleTexting2 of 40Not among the top eight

Sinch2 of 40Not among the top eight

Telnyx2 of 40Not among the top eight

Twilio2 of 40Not among the top eight

Authkey1 of 41Not among the top eight

Agora.io1 of 40Not among the top eight

Azure Communication Services1 of 40Not among the top eight

Bird1 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TextMagic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named TextMagic and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

apiscout.dev2

fitsmallbusiness.com2

g2.com2

learn.g2.com2

rfp.wiki2

textmagic.comYour site2

au.pcmag.com1

authgear.com1

brilo.ai1

checkthat.ai1

Fourteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming TextMagic came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-cpaas-providers2

learn.g2.com/best-cpaas-platforms2

textmagic.com/blog/best-sms-apis2

apiscout.dev/guides/best-communication-apis-20261

apiscout.dev/guides/best-sms-api-for-developers-20261

au.pcmag.com/old-marketing-automation-software/86602/twilio-sendgrid-marketing-campaigns1

authgear.com/post/best-sms-api-providers1

brilo.ai/resources/twilio-alternatives1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

textmagic.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TextMagic takes 0% of first choices and Twilio takes 43%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “communications api platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “communications api platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 8,100 a month (“textmagic”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 29 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 99,415 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 14,387 · 373 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 4,899
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

119+ ads · 68 text, 39 video, 12 image · 29 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2024, as Textmagic Limited, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 107 in the year, 12 before. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 67 of 71 in cpaas

Segment leader

43%

Twilio

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 4 answers
Its own site cited: in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on textmagic.com

698

subdomains included

Content

306

counted in the table below

Documentation

268

Product · Integration

10 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	193	4	2026-08-14
Case study	52	0	2026-06-30
Comparison	17	0	2025-11-10
Template or tool	16	0	2025-05-21
Podcast or video	12	1	2026-08-03
Glossary or explainer	11	1	2026-07-25
Report or ebook	5	0	2025-01-29

Most recent

2026-08-14Automate sms order notifications woocommerce blog
2026-08-04How to ask customers for feedback blog
2026-08-03Shopify sms integration podcast or video
2026-07-27Feedback request text message templates blog
2026-07-25What is sms and how is it different from text messages glossary or explainer
2026-07-16Acma sms sender id rules blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page textmagic.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow TextMagic

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

TextMagic is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Business text messaging for marketing and communications
textmagic.com
For: businesses
textmagic.com
Price stated: Flexible pay-as-you-go pricing textmagic.com
Starting price: 0.049 textmagic.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Free trial textmagic.com
Integrations claimed: 1000 textmagic.com
Certifications: A2P 10DLCToll-FreeTCPACTIASOC 2 Type IIGDPR compliantPECRCASL
Customers named: Wellspace HealthcareShuqualak ManufacturingAthenix HealthcareWynterJJMIXICAJakolof Bay OystersComal Inn
Not stated on the pages read: Hosting

What TextMagic's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: textmagic.com, textmagic.com/pricing, textmagic.com/features, textmagic.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TextMagic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TextMagic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TextMagic by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where TextMagic is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name TextMagic, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.