Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 70 → 77 of 84
RSA Governance & Lifecycle
4Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. RSA Governance & Lifecycle was named 1 time in IGA, where Microsoft Entra ID Governance led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business81 of 89
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market57 of 76
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise73 of 76
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In iga · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named RSA Governance & Lifecycle for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity governance | Identity and access | 0% | 57 of 76 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID Governance at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, RSA Governance & Lifecycle held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · IGA · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 52 → 53 of 71
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 46 → 68 of 70
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGA | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 52 → 57 of 76 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated RSA Governance & Lifecycle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated RSA Governance & Lifecycle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as RSA Governance & Lifecycle, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RSA Governance & Lifecycle was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as RSA Governance & Lifecycle, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RSA Governance & Lifecycle was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RSA Governance & Lifecycle. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 4 answers that named RSA Governance & Lifecycle and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
zluri.com3
avatier.com2
expertinsights.com2
oneidentity.com2
solutionsreview.com2
startwithidentity.com2
adm-adria.si1
aimultiple.com1
almcorp.com1
businesswire.com1
Seventeen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming RSA Governance & Lifecycle came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
rsa.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, RSA Governance & Lifecycle takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Entra ID Governance takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
rsa.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, RSA Governance & Lifecycle takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Entra ID Governance takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “identity governance platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “identity governance platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Its company's site
- rsa.com shared with RSA's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 45,286 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,730 · 450 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 13,773
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 57 of 76 in IGA
Segment leader
25%
Microsoft Entra ID Governance
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 4 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 3 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow RSA Governance & Lifecycle
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
RSA is the company behind RSA Governance & Lifecycle.ShowHide
The company
RSA is the company behind RSA Governance & Lifecycle.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from RSA
- RSA ID Plus, RSA Identity Governance & Lifecycle, RSA SecurID, RSA Security
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Identity governance and administration solutions for cloud, hybrid, and on-premises
- For
- government, finance, and high-assurance organizations
- Price stated
- Start your free trial rsa.com/contact/governance-lifecycle-free-trial
- Free plan or trial
- Start a free G&L trial rsa.com/products/governance-lifecycle
- Certifications
- CJISHIPAAISO 27001IRS 1075SOX23 NYCRR 500PCI-DSSNIST 800-53
- Hosting
- cloudhybridon-premises
- Customers named
- Sorenson Communications
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations
What RSA Governance & Lifecycle's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: rsa.com/products/governance-lifecycle, rsa.com/contact/governance-lifecycle-free-trial, rsa.com/fr_ca/products/governance-lifecycle, rsa.com/pt_br/products/governance-lifecycle, rsa.com/fr_ca/contact/governance-lifecycle-free-trial. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RSA Governance & Lifecycle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RSA Governance & Lifecycle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for RSA Governance & Lifecycle by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where RSA Governance & Lifecycle is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name RSA Governance & Lifecycle, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.