IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Rippling IT · September 2026 Edition
Rippling · 1 category · Ranked

Rippling IT

35Judge labels
10First choices
5Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
16% in ITAM for small business buyers
Rank 46 of 52 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 100% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In uem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Rippling IT for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Unified endpoint managementIT operations and endpoint0%46 of 52100%1under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Intune at 43%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Rippling IT yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Rippling IT across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00011
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels4
Paraphrase7 labels4
Comparative5 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labels2
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“may not be the best option for organizations with complex IT environments” Llama 4 Maverick · UEM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Rippling IT, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rippling IT was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Snipe-IT20 of 357Not in the top three
Freshservice16 of 351Not in the top three
Asset Panda12 of 351Not in the top three
NinjaOne12 of 350Not in the top three
ManageEngine AssetExplorer10 of 350Not in the top three
Microsoft Intune8 of 353Not in the top three
InvGate Asset Management8 of 350Not in the top three
BlueTally7 of 351Not in the top three
Lansweeper7 of 351Not in the top three
Jamf7 of 350Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rippling IT. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 35 answers that named Rippling IT and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as Rippling IT

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Rippling IT; a claim can dispute any of them.
Rippling 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rippling IT's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rippling IT, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at rippling.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack