| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT asset management | IT operations and endpoint | 24% | 1 of 61 | 17% | 42 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the strongest default choice is usually Snipe-IT because it is repeatedly described as the best *free or low-cost* option” Perplexity Sonar · ITAM · budget prompt · first choice
“For the absolute lowest cost, Snipe-IT (free self-hosted) or Spiceworks (free with ads) are excellent choices.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ITAM · budget prompt · first choice
“Snipe-IT (Best Overall Free Option) ... It's the most mature, well-supported open-source option with no limits.” Kimi K2 · ITAM · budget prompt · first choice
“the best IT asset management (ITAM) platform is Snipe-IT's free, self-hosted open-source version” Grok 4.1 Fast · ITAM · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Some users in the sysadmin community have expressed dissatisfaction with Snipe-IT and recommend avoiding it” Mistral Small · ITAM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Great if you have the internal resources to host and customize it, though it lacks deep out-of-the-box SaaS discovery.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITAM · scale prompt · soft negative
“tools like Snipe-IT and GLPI track licenses in terms of assigned seats but neither tool meters real usage” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ITAM · negative prompt · soft negative
“some platforms to be cautious about include: 1. Snipe-it (as mentioned in one of the search results)” Llama 4 Maverick · ITAM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 85 of the 110 answers that named Snipe-IT and are not a share of its labels.
373 of the 373 domain citations in answers naming Snipe-IT came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Snipe-IT's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Snipe-IT, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at snipeitapp.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.