Every category where a model named Asset Panda for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
IT asset management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	10 of 61	14%	21	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Asset Panda yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Asset Panda across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	1	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	1	3
Mistral Small	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	2	2	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	1	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labels1

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative20 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained7 labels1

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative55 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Asset Panda or Reftab: Highly customizable, great for companies with a mix of IT and operational/physical assets” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITAM · scale prompt · alternative

“Asset Panda at $5/user/month provides good balance between affordability and functionality” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ITAM · budget prompt · alternative

“Choose Asset Panda if: You need mobile-first operations with configurable workflows” Kimi K2 · ITAM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Simplicity & mobility; less “enterprise” depth but very quick to deploy” MiniMax M2.5 · ITAM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Offers flexible asset tracking but does not support logistics or IT asset disposition (ITAD) processes.” Mistral Small · ITAM · negative prompt · soft negative

“Manual entry reliance (e.g., some SMB tools like Asset Panda); no/low cloud/SaaS coverage.” Grok 4.1 Fast · ITAM · negative prompt · soft negative

“requires a great deal of manual labor, leading to setup fatigue and low adoption rates” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITAM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Asset Panda, over the 55 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Asset Panda was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Snipe-IT45 of 5511Not in the top three

ServiceNow IT Asset Management34 of 556Not in the top three

Freshservice31 of 556Not in the top three

ManageEngine AssetExplorer31 of 553Not in the top three

Lansweeper24 of 551Not in the top three

Flexera One18 of 552Not in the top three

InvGate Asset Management17 of 551Not in the top three

Ivanti Neurons for ITAM16 of 550Not in the top three

NinjaOne13 of 552Not in the top three

Device4213 of 550Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Asset Panda. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 48 of the 55 answers that named Asset Panda and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

virima.com35

cloudaware.com30

assetpanda.comYour site27

blog.invgate.com26

assetmanagement.global24

rippling.com21

forbes.com17

techradar.com13

desk365.io12

g2.com12

190 of the 217 domain citations in answers naming Asset Panda came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

virima.com/blog/top-asset-management-tools-you-need-to-know-about32

cloudaware.com/blog/asset-management-tools26

assetpanda.com/resource-center/compare/best-it-asset-management-software-top-itam-platform25

blog.invgate.com/it-asset-management-software20

rippling.com/blog/best-it-asset-management-small-business18

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-it-asset-management-software16

assetmanagement.global/blog/it-asset-management/best-it-asset-management-software14

techradar.com/best/best-asset-management-software12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Asset Panda's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Asset Panda, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at assetpanda.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.