Small business▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 5 → 3 of 67
3 categories · RankedLansweeper
126Judge labels
15First choices
13Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
14% in ITAM for mid-market buyers
Rank 3 of 82 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 45 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Lansweeper →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business3 of 74
6%31 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market3 of 82
14%45 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise3 of 91
9%41 labels
accepted challenger
In itam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Lansweeper for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT asset management | IT operations and endpoint | 14% | 3 of 82 | 11% | 45 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 16% → 13%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| IT documentation | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 31 of 92 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Hudu at 17% | |
| Patch management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 33 of 85 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus at 29% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Lansweeper held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · ITAM · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 16% → 13%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
13%from 16% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 4 → 3 of 75
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 3 → 4 of 85
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITAM | 16% | 13% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 16% → 13%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 3 of 82 |
| IT documentation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 31 of 92, unchanged |
| Patching | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 33 of 85, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Lansweeper across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Lansweeper across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labels1
Paraphrase31 labels10
Comparative29 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained20 labels4
Scale-constrained15 labelsNone
Negative16 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative126 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Most recommended: For the majority of mid-sized B2B companies, Lansweeper offers the best balance of automated discovery, software license management, cost-effectiveness, and scalability” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ITAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd usually recommend Lansweeper if your main goal is accurate hardware + software inventory/discovery” GPT-5.4 mini · ITAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder for Deep Discovery: Lansweeper ... Lansweeper is the industry standard.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best IT asset management platform is usually Lansweeper” GPT-5.4 mini · ITAM · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Platforms to Avoid Due to Performance/Stability Issues... it becomes "bloated."” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ITAM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Who should avoid/be cautious: Small-to-midsize businesses with tight, predictable budgets who do not want to be locked into multi-year, rising-cost contracts.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITAM · negative prompt · soft negative
“user sentiment can be mixed in some review channels, so I'd caution buyers to test reporting depth, support responsiveness, and total cost before committing” GPT-5.4 mini · ITAM · negative prompt · soft negative
“may be unnecessary for very small teams or for organizations mainly seeking simple manual asset tracking” Perplexity Sonar · ITAM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lansweeper, over the 126 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lansweeper was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lansweeper, over the 126 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lansweeper was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lansweeper. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 117 of the 126 answers that named Lansweeper and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.invgate.com52
virima.com51
ezo.io39
cloudaware.com34
desk365.io34
guideflow.com31
gocodes.com30
resources.rework.com30
assetmanagement.global29
designrush.com28
358 of the 358 domain citations in answers naming Lansweeper came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
lansweeper.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Lansweeper takes 14% of first choices and Freshservice takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
lansweeper.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Lansweeper takes 14% of first choices and Freshservice takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “it asset management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “it asset management platforms”
5
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“lansweeper”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 152 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 29,325 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,060 · 365 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,611
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
14%
rank 3 of 82 in ITAM
Segment leader
31%
Freshservice
- First choices
- 15 across its categories
- Named in
- 126 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 117 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on lansweeper.com
2,231
subdomains included
Content
1,704
counted in the table below
Documentation
5
Product · Integration
109 · 242
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 817 | undated | ITAM, ITSM | ||
| Blog | 768 | 13 | 2026-09-25 | ITAM, ITSM | |
| News or press | 45 | 1 | 2026-07-27 | GRC | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 31 | undated | ITAM, SOAR | ||
| Conference or event | 22 | 0 | 2021-09-03 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 13 | 1 | 2026-07-06 | ITAM, ASM | |
| Comparison | 5 | 1 | 2026-08-06 | ITAM, ITSM | |
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2024-03-19 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Updates to our legal framework blog
- 2026-09-25Device lifecycle management how it leaders reduce risk and control costs blog
- 2026-09-24How to build the business case for it asset management and get it funded blog
- 2026-09-18Eu ai act compliance what you need to know before august 2 2026 blog
- 2026-09-15We solved its problems one at a time thats exactly why we cant see our own estate blog
- 2026-09-08Microsoft patch tuesday september 2026 blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- June 2, 2026 to June 4, 2026Infosecurity Europe 2026ExCeL London, London, United Kingdom · exhibited
- June 2, 2026Scope is not a phase: Why asset fidelity is the missing foundation of cyber resilience.Resilience & Cyber Risk Theatre, London, United Kingdom · spoke
As the event pages on lansweeper.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page lansweeper.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Lansweeper
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Lansweeper is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Lansweeper is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Cyber Asset Intelligence
- For
- IT and Security teams
- Price stated
- Clear pricing as you grow lansweeper.com
- Starting price
- 199 lansweeper.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- 14 days, full platform, no credit card required. lansweeper.com
- Customers named
- University of YorkHitachi EnergyRentokilBekaertQarmetGreenyardUCCMMitsubishi Electric
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What Lansweeper's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: lansweeper.com, lansweeper.com/pricing, lansweeper.com/about/trust, lansweeper.com/product/ai, lansweeper.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lansweeper's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lansweeper, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lansweeper by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Lansweeper is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lansweeper, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Lansweeper is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Lansweeper is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideLansweeper is among the products AI models recommend first in IT asset management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.