2 categories · RankedLansweeper
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT asset management | IT operations and endpoint | 16% | 4 of 61 | 11% | 38 | accepted challenger |
| Vulnerability management platforms | Security operations | 0% | 41 of 80 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 45% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“my default recommendation would be Lansweeper if you want the best balance of hardware discovery, software inventory, and ease of rollout” GPT-5.4 mini · ITAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The Best for Deep Discovery & Simplicity: Lansweeper ... frequently rated the highest for mid-market organizations.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ITAM · direct prompt · first choice
“Lansweeper is a top recommendation due to its balance of automation, accuracy, and ease of use.” Mistral Small · ITAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Start with Spiceworks or Lansweeper's free tier — they're free and require minimal setup” MiniMax M2.5 · ITAM · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Red flags: Dated UI; rigid reporting; no native physical asset support... Strong for agentless scanning otherwise.” Grok 4.1 Fast · ITAM · negative prompt · soft negative
“It may be overkill for very small teams and is not ideal if your main need is basic manual tracking” Perplexity Sonar · ITAM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Free up to 100 assets | Excellent discovery, but scales to paid (~$1/asset/year)” Grok 4.1 Fast · ITAM · budget prompt · soft negative
“good product, but it's usually better when you have a bit more budget” GPT-5.4 mini · ITAM · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 91 of the 112 answers that named Lansweeper and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
366 of the 366 domain citations in answers naming Lansweeper came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lansweeper's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lansweeper, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at lansweeper.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.