Small business▲+5Since September 2026: 6% → 11%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 6 → 5 of 56
Check Point · 2 categories · RankedCheck Point Harmony Email & Collaboration
83Judge labels
9First choices
8Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in Email security for small business buyers
Rank 6 of 76 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 3% of its 35 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 66
9%22 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market6 of 76
8%35 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise8 of 61
0%23 labels
accepted challenger
In email security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email security | Security operations | 8% | 6 of 76 | 3% | 35 | accepted challenger | ▼−1Since September 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Data loss prevention | Security operations | 0% | 75 of 89 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview DLP at 46% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Email security · by segment
Mid-market▼−1Since September 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 4 of 71, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 9 → 6 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email security | 10% | 9% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 6 of 76 |
| DLP | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 75 of 89, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct21 labels6
Paraphrase7 labels2
Comparative28 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained8 labels1
Negative18 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative83 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best Overall for Security Efficacy and Collaboration Apps Avanan is widely considered a market leader because of its patented architecture.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Email security · direct prompt · first choice
“Best for: Maximum detection strength and proactive blocking ... a market leader because of its unique architecture” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Email security · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“such as Abnormal Security, Avanan, or Sublime) connect directly to your email provider via native APIs” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Email security · negative prompt · first choice
“Proofpoint and Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration are top choices” Mistral Small · Email security · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Several major vendors (including Avanan/Check Point, Proofpoint, and Mimecast) scan emails by re-wrapping them or stripping headers” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Email security · negative prompt · soft negative
“false positives, mistakenly marking important emails as spam frequently” Muse Glimmer 30B · DLP · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, over the 82 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, over the 82 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 80 of the 82 answers that named Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
gartner.com38
ironscales.com37
kaseya.com37
proofpoint.com37
huntress.com33
sublime.security33
g2.com32
checkpoint.comYour site31
expertinsights.com30
comparitech.com26
303 of the 334 domain citations in answers naming Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“check point harmony email & collaboration”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Check Point's site (checkpoint.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
8%
rank 6 of 76 in email security
Segment leader
32%
Microsoft Defender for Office 365
- First choices
- 9 across its categories
- Named in
- 82 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 80 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration; a claim can dispute any of them.
Check Point 8Check Point Avanan 4Check Point Harmony Email 4Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration (formerly Avanan) 4Avanan 3Check Point Email Security 2Avanan (Check Point) 1Avanan (by Check Point) 1Avanan/Check Point 1Check Point (Avanan / Harmony Email & Collaboration) 1Check Point Email Security (Harmony Email & Collaboration) 1Check Point Email Security / DLP 1Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, formerly Avanan 1Check Point Harmony Email (Avanan) 1Check Point/Avanan 1
Follow Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Check Point is the company behind Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration.ShowHide
The company
Check Point is the company behind Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Protect your workspace with email security, office & collaboration security and web application security
- For
- your workspace
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free Trial checkpoint.com/harmony/saas
- Customers named
- ArmisCloudReach
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: checkpoint.com/harmony, blog.checkpoint.com/harmony-sase, blog.checkpoint.com/email-security, checkpoint.com/harmony/saas, checkpoint.com/harmony/sase. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.