| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email security | Security operations | 10% | 4 of 76 | 13% | 31 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 7% → 11%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Communications archiving and compliance | Security operations | 0% | 96 of 101 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Smarsh Enterprise Archive at 20% | |
| Managed detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 27 of 67 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email security | 7% | 11% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 7% → 11%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 4 of 76 |
| Comms archiving | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 96 of 101, unchanged |
| MDR | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 27 of 67, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Barracuda and SpamTitan are consistently highlighted as the most affordable and accessible options for budget-conscious companies.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email security · budget prompt · first choice
“"the platform of choice for budget-conscious SMBs and lean IT departments"... Start with SpamTitan or Barracuda” MiniMax M2.5 · Email security · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Barracuda as the strongest all-around choice for phishing and email threat protection.” Perplexity Sonar · Email security · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Barracuda is also noted for being a top pick for SMBs and lean IT departments” Mistral Small · Email security · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“A botched server migration in 2018 exposed archived emails containing personal and medical data for 277,139 patients” Kimi K2 · Comms archiving · negative prompt · hard negative
“Barracuda Email Protection (High Caution / Avoid)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Email security · negative prompt · hard negative
“Barracuda disclosed an RCE vulnerability affecting its Email Security Gateway appliances... not, by itself, to reject all Barracuda products.” GPT-6 Luna · Email security · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caveat: Some users report significant price increases at renewal and forced migrations to bundled products” Kimi K2 · Email security · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 92 of the 94 answers that named Barracuda Email Protection and are not a share of its labels.
369 of the 369 domain citations in answers naming Barracuda Email Protection came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Barracuda Email Protection's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: barracuda.com/products/email-protection, de.blog.barracuda.com/category/email-protection, barracuda.com/campaigns/barracuda-advancement-email-protection, barracuda.com/products/email-protection/msp, barracuda.com/products/email-protection/plans. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Barracuda Email Protection's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Barracuda Email Protection, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Barracuda Email Protection by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: