Small business▲+11Since September 2026: 2% → 13%, +11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
13%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 0 pointsRank 7 → 3 of 56
1 category · RankedSpamTitan
49Judge labels
14First choices
6Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
16% in Email security for mid-market buyers
Rank 2 of 76 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 19 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of SpamTitan →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business4 of 66
11%25 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market2 of 76
16%19 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise17 of 61
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In email security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SpamTitan for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email security | Security operations | 16% | 2 of 76 | 0% | 19 | accepted challenger | ▲+13Since September 2026: 5% → 18%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SpamTitan moved past the floor in its one category, Email security, +13 points to 18%.
Best category · Email security · by segment
Mid-market▲+13Since September 2026: 5% → 18%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
18%from 5% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 2 pointsRank 8 → 2 of 71
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 7 → 27 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email security | 5% | 18% | ▲+13Since September 2026: 5% → 18%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 8 → 2 of 76 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SpamTitan across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SpamTitan across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels1
Paraphrase7 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained19 labels13
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative49 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best email security platform for a company with a limited budget is SpamTitan, which is a budget-friendly spam and malware filtering solution for SMBs and MSPs” Llama 4 Maverick · Email security · budget prompt · first choice
“Specifically mentioned as "budget-friendly" and "solid choice for budget-conscious teams"... For smallest budgets: Start with SpamTitan or Barracuda” MiniMax M2.5 · Email security · budget prompt · first choice
“Barracuda and SpamTitan are consistently highlighted as the most affordable and accessible options” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email security · budget prompt · first choice
“SpamTitan stands out as one of the best email security platforms for companies on a limited budget” Grok 4.20 · Email security · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SpamTitan, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SpamTitan was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SpamTitan, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SpamTitan was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SpamTitan. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 48 of the 49 answers that named SpamTitan and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ironscales.com36
expertinsights.com27
g2.com24
esecurityplanet.com23
kaseya.com22
comparitech.com21
huntress.com21
en.softonic.com14
capterra.com13
learn.g2.com13
214 of the 214 domain citations in answers naming SpamTitan came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
spamtitan.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SpamTitan takes 16% of first choices and Microsoft Defender for Office 365 takes 32%.ShowHide
Search and answers
spamtitan.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SpamTitan takes 16% of first choices and Microsoft Defender for Office 365 takes 32%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “email security platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “email security platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“spamtitan”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 22 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4,190 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 989 · 87 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,728
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
16%
rank 2 of 76 in email security
Segment leader
32%
Microsoft Defender for Office 365
- First choices
- 14 across its categories
- Named in
- 49 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 48 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on spamtitan.com
1,157
subdomains included
Content
679
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 625 | 0 | 2025-04-30 | Email security, MFA | |
| Report or ebook | 15 | 0 | 2025-02-16 | ||
| Conference or event | 14 | 0 | 2018-01-16 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 0 | 2023-10-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 0 | 2018-12-04 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | 0 | 2019-07-09 | Email security | |
| Case study | 4 | 0 | 2024-10-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2025-04-30Dkim replay phishing attempt google blog
- 2025-04-28Microsoft teams tech support scam female executives blog
- 2025-04-26Human element 60 percent data breaches blog
- 2025-04-25Uk government survey confirms phishing biggest threat businesses blog
- 2025-04-24Wine tasting phishing emails used to target embassy staff in malware campaign blog
- 2025-04-22Getshared and other legitimate services abused in phishing campaigns blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page spamtitan.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as SpamTitan
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SpamTitan; a claim can dispute any of them.
SpamTitan (by TitanHQ) 1SpamTitan by TitanHQ 1
Follow SpamTitan
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SpamTitan is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SpamTitan is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Leading Email Protection and Anti-Spam Solutions
- For
- MSPs
- Price stated
- Get a free quote spamtitan.com/pricing-bundles
- Free plan or trial
- Start free trial spamtitan.com
- Customers named
- Healthcare CompanyGenie SupportCode Vapor LLCSelfridgesNRCHuron Valley SteelKennedyIHOUSE Web
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What SpamTitan's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: spamtitan.com, spamtitan.com/pricing-bundles, spamtitan.com/products, spamtitan.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SpamTitan's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SpamTitan, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SpamTitan by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SpamTitan is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SpamTitan, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where SpamTitan is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where SpamTitan is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideSpamTitan is among the products AI models recommend first in Email security this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.