Three of twelve models named Microsoft Defender for Office 365 first on the direct prompt; three named Proofpoint Email Protection. Both were named by all twelve models and Microsoft Defender for Office 365 carries 47 labels and Proofpoint Email Protection 49, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the email security page.
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Limitation: Research shows third-party solutions are significantly more effective (44-93x according to some vendors)” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“You should be cautious about treating MDO as your *only* line of defense; it’s a baseline, not a full security platform.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Weak on standalone advanced threats—layer with others if needed.” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · soft negative
“should start with Microsoft Defender for Office 365 as the baseline and add IRONSCALES as a phishing-specific layer” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you're already on Microsoft 365 → Microsoft Defender for Office 365 - Best value when bundled with M365 Business Premium” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The Industry Standard Alternatives... such as Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint, Mimecast, or Netskope.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Proofpoint is priced and configured for enterprise environments with significant operational complexity... it just may not be suitable for smaller organizations.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Traditional SEGs (like legacy Proofpoint or Mimecast setups) require rerouting your MX records, which is complex to manage and can disrupt mail flow.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“priced and configured for enterprise environments with significant operational complexity and generally positioned above SMB budgets” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · soft negative
“I'd suggest starting with Microsoft Defender for Office 365 if you're on M365, or Proofpoint Core Email Protection if you need more advanced features” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“look toward platforms that specialize exclusively in email security ... such as Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint, Mimecast, or Netskope.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Proofpoint Essentials and Barracuda Email Protection are top recommendations due to their balance of advanced features, scalability, and value.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.