| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Master data management | Data platform | 41% | 1 of 92 | 2% | 51 | endorsed leader |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend starting with Profisee if you're in the Microsoft ecosystem, as it offers the best balance of features, pricing, and ease of implementation” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Master data · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Highly rated for mid-market companies... strong balance of powerful multi-domain MDM features with a lower total cost of ownership and fast deployment times.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Master data · scale prompt · first choice
“Profisee is known for an industry-leading low total cost of ownership, rapid implementation and a truly flexible multi-domain platform.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Master data · budget prompt · first choice
“if your firm is Microsoft-centric (which is extremely common in B2B), Profisee will likely be the smoothest operational fit” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Master data · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Profisee: Lacks strong PIM capabilities (like BOM support) and doesn't leverage NoSQL/ graph databases” MiniMax M2.5 · Master data · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 141 of the 146 answers that named Profisee MDM and are not a share of its labels.
493 of the 574 domain citations in answers naming Profisee MDM came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 254 | 7 | 2026-08-31 | ||
| Podcast or video | 116 | 6 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Conference or event | 113 | 12 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Case study | 39 | 0 | 2025-11-19 | ||
| News or press | 29 | 4 | 2026-08-26 | ||
| Comparison | 18 | 0 | 2025-12-12 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 0 | 2026-03-10 |
Every page profisee.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Profisee MDM's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: profisee.com, profisee.com/pricing, profisee.com/security, profisee.com/platform, profisee.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Profisee MDM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Profisee MDM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Profisee MDM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Profisee MDM first in Master data management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.