Every category where a model named Pimcore for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Master data management	Data platform	12%	4 of 92	13%	23	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Pimcore yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Pimcore across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	1	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	1	3
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	1	0	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	0	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labelsNone

Paraphrase11 labels3

Comparative11 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained20 labels12

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative16 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative72 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 21 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For a genuinely tight budget, Pimcore is worth a look if you have technical staff and your needs are mainly product or catalog data.” GPT-6 Luna · Master data · budget prompt · first choice

“No software budget, but we have strong PHP developers. | Pimcore | Zero licensing costs and infinite flexibility to customize.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Master data · budget prompt · first choice

“Pimcore is the strongest overall choice because it is widely described as an affordable open-source MDM option” Perplexity Sonar · Master data · budget prompt · first choice

“starting with AtroCore or Pimcore's free open-source editions is the smartest approach” Kimi K2 · Master data · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Some users like the breadth of platforms such as Pimcore or MaPS System, but review feedback often mentions that these can take time to master” GPT-5.4 mini · Master data · negative prompt · soft negative

“Open-source/SMB options (e.g., AtroCore, Pimcore): Cost-effective but cautioned for lacking enterprise-grade SLAs” Grok 4.1 Fast · Master data · negative prompt · soft negative

“Open-source options can be risky without strong technical support.” Mistral Small · Master data · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Pimcore, over the 72 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pimcore was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Profisee MDM55 of 7221Compare →

Semarchy xDM51 of 727Compare →

AtroCore MDM48 of 728Compare →

Informatica MDM45 of 720Compare →

SAP Master Data Governance27 of 720Not among the top eight

Reltio26 of 720Compare →

Boomi MDM23 of 721Not among the top eight

Stibo Systems STEP21 of 720Not among the top eight

IBM InfoSphere20 of 720Not among the top eight

Ataccama ONE15 of 720Compare →

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pimcore. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 71 of the 72 answers that named Pimcore and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

atrocore.com59

geopostcodes.com31

g2.com30

profisee.com26

semarchy.com26

fanruan.com25

devopsschool.com21

guideflow.com21

ovaledge.com21

fortegrp.com20

280 of the 280 domain citations in answers naming Pimcore came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

atrocore.com/en/blog/best-master-data-management-tools56

geopostcodes.com/blog/comparison-master-data-management-tools28

semarchy.com/blog/top-master-data-management-solutions-compared23

ovaledge.com/blog/master-data-management-tools21

fanruan.com/en/blog/master-data-management-solutions-importance-business-success20

fortegrp.com/insights/top-19-data-management-tools-platforms-in-the-usa20

atrocore.com/en/blog/master-data-management-tools18

guideflow.com/blog/master-data-management-software18

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

pimcore.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pimcore takes 12% of first choices and Profisee MDM takes 41%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “master data management platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “master data management platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 880 a month (“pimcore”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 22 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 4,825 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 694 · 98 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,560
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

11 ads · 11 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2025, as Pimcore GmbH, verified. 5 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

12%

rank 4 of 92 in master data

Segment leader

41%

Profisee MDM

First choices: 15 across its categories
Named in: 72 answers
Its own site cited: in 71 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on pimcore.com

1,510

subdomains included

Content

292

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

133 · 66

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	117	2	2026-08-27
Case study	97	0	2024-10-18
Glossary or explainer	44	undated
Report or ebook	18	undated
Comparison	14	undated
Conference or event	2	undated

Most recent

2026-08-27Pimcore tenzing next chapter blog
2026-07-09Pimcore platform version 2026 2 blog
2026-06-22When agents become the users saas bottleneck agentic ai blog
2026-05-15The data dna of the pet industry blog
2026-04-14Pimcore paas introducing boosters for real time infrastructure flexibility blog
2026-04-14Pimcore platform version 2026.1 a new era of data and experience management blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page pimcore.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Pimcore

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Pimcore; a claim can dispute any of them.

Pimcore (Community Edition) 1

Follow Pimcore

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Pimcore is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The unifying platform for enterprise data and experience.
pimcore.com
For: enterprise
pimcore.com
Price stated: fair, transparent plans pimcore.com
Starting price: 9,900 $ per year pimcore.com/en/pricing
Free plan or trial: Community Edition Try Pimcore for free and start experimenting, all based on its open core. pimcore.com
Hosting: multi-cloud and region optionsmulti-cloudregion options
Customers named: audigantintersportgaborvespastanley-black-decker_1burgerkingt-mobile-dark
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, certifications

What Pimcore's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: pimcore.com, pimcore.com/en/pricing, pimcore.com/en/products/open-core, pimcore.com/en/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pimcore's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pimcore, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Pimcore by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Pimcore is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Pimcore, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.