Ten of fourteen models named Profisee MDM first on the direct prompt; zero named AtroCore MDM. Profisee MDM was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and AtroCore MDM by eleven and Profisee MDM carries 51 labels and AtroCore MDM 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the master data management page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Profisee MDM and AtroCore MDM were named in the same answer forty-two times, of the 146 answers naming Profisee MDM and the 62 naming AtroCore MDM. In those answers AtroCore MDM took the first choice thirteen times and Profisee MDM seventeen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Profisee: Lacks strong PIM capabilities (like BOM support) and doesn't leverage NoSQL/ graph databases” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with Profisee if you're in the Microsoft ecosystem, as it offers the best balance of features, pricing, and ease of implementation” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Highly rated for mid-market companies... strong balance of powerful multi-domain MDM features with a lower total cost of ownership and fast deployment times.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Profisee is known for an industry-leading low total cost of ownership, rapid implementation and a truly flexible multi-domain platform.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Open-source/SMB options (e.g., AtroCore, Pimcore): Cost-effective but cautioned for lacking enterprise-grade SLAs” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Open-source options can be risky without strong technical support.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you need a truly free, no revenue limit core and can self-host: AtroCore Open Source Edition. Free core with free import/export modules, MIT-licensed, no revenue threshold.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“AtroCore: A strong open-source MDM option for B2B companies, particularly suitable for mid-sized companies with 200 to 2,000 employees.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I would recommend starting with either: AtroCore if you want an open-source, flexible solution with strong governance capabilities” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.