IBM InfoSphere MDM
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Master data management | Data platform | 0% | 72 of 92 | 46% | 13 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated IBM InfoSphere MDM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Informatica or IBM if you have a massive budget, complex governance needs, and a large internal technical team.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Master data · comparative prompt · alternative
“For complex, legacy‑centric hybrid environments: Talend (Qlik Talend Cloud), IBM InfoSphere MDM, TIBCO EBX.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Master data · comparative prompt · alternative
“Regulated, compliance-heavy, hybrid environments | IBM InfoSphere” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Master data · comparative prompt · alternative
“Informatica MDM or IBM InfoSphere MDM are strong choices.” Mistral Small · Master data · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid or be cautious with: IBM InfoSphere MDM — unless you're deeply committed to IBM ecosystem and can handle legacy complexity” Kimi K2 · Master data · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid or be cautious with IBM InfoSphere MDM and SAP MDG if your organization is not prepared for their complexity and cost.” Mistral Small · Master data · negative prompt · hard negative
“describe them as expensive, complex, and better suited to large or highly regulated enterprises rather than smaller teams” Perplexity Sonar · Master data · negative prompt · soft negative
“Complex, heavy‑weight architecture; steep learning curve ... Overkill for many mid‑size firms; long implementation cycles” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Master data · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as IBM InfoSphere MDM, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and IBM InfoSphere MDM was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 42 answers that named IBM InfoSphere MDM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
192 of the 192 domain citations in answers naming IBM InfoSphere MDM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where IBM InfoSphere MDM stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 140 a month (“ibm infosphere mdm”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 7 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on IBM's site (ibm.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 42 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 41 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow IBM InfoSphere MDM
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
IBM is the company behind IBM InfoSphere MDM.ShowHide
The company
On record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Drive deeper insights with a trusted view of critical enterprise data on the IBM Cloud Pak for Data platform.
- For
- berbagai industri
- Free plan or trial
- Pruebe la versión beta InfoSphere Master Data Management en IBM Cloud Pak for Data. ibm.com/es-es/products/ibm-infosphere-master-data-management
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What IBM InfoSphere MDM's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: ibm.com/products/ibm-infosphere-master-data-management, ibm.com/es-es/products/ibm-infosphere-master-data-management, ibm.com/fr-fr/products/ibm-infosphere-master-data-management, ibm.com/id-id/products/ibm-infosphere-master-data-management, ibm.com/it-it/products/ibm-infosphere-master-data-management. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when IBM InfoSphere MDM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as IBM InfoSphere MDM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for IBM InfoSphere MDM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where IBM InfoSphere MDM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name IBM InfoSphere MDM, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.