Index › Vendors › PingOne for Customers · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

PingOne for Customers

8Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. PingOne for Customers was named 3 times in CIAM and 1 other category, where Auth0 led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business43 of 52

under the label threshold

Mid-market25 of 74

under the label threshold

Enterprise18 of 60

under the label threshold

In ciam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named PingOne for Customers for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer identity and access management	Identity and access	0%	25 of 74	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Auth0 at 22%
Workforce identity and SSO	Identity and access	0%	45 of 48	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PingOne for Customers yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PingOne for Customers across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose PingOne for Customers if you expect to lean heavily into identity orchestration, no-code flows” GPT-5.4 mini · CIAM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“marketed as workforce solutions (e.g., some modules of Auth0, PingOne for Customers” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce identity · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PingOne for Customers, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PingOne for Customers was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Auth06 of 83Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra External ID4 of 81Not in the top three

Keycloak3 of 81Not in the top three

Amazon Cognito3 of 80Not in the top three

ForgeRock3 of 80Not in the top three

Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud2 of 80Not in the top three

FusionAuth2 of 80Not in the top three

OneLogin2 of 80Not in the top three

WorkOS2 of 80Not in the top three

Authentik1 of 81Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PingOne for Customers. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 8 answers that named PingOne for Customers and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com4

ibtimes.com4

idmworks.com4

bestdevops.com3

guideflow.com3

loginradius.com3

securityboulevard.com3

worldmetrics.org3

ciopages.com2

descope.com2

No domain is on file for PingOne for Customers, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/top-customer-identity-and-access-managem4

ibtimes.com/top-5-best-customer-identity-access-management-ciam-solutions-2026-38008784

idmworks.com/insight/customer-identity-and-access-management4

bestdevops.com/top-10-customer-iam-ciam-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison3

guideflow.com/blog/ciam-software3

loginradius.com/blog/identity/top-descope-alternatives3

securityboulevard.com/2026/08/top-5-enterprise-ciam-platforms-in-2026-in-depth-comparison3

ciopages.com/buyer-guides/customer-identity-access-management2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PingOne for Customers's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PingOne for Customers, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.