AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › SSOJet · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

SSOJet

30Judge labels
5First choices
2Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SSOJet was named 3 times in CIAM and 1 other category, where Frontegg led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ciam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SSOJet for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Customer identity and access managementIdentity and access0%29 of 700%2under 10 labels · led by Frontegg at 21%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Workforce identity and SSOIdentity and access0%27 of 440%1under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID at 46%goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.

Movement

Since September 2026, SSOJet held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · CIAM · by segment

Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 10 → 20 of 46
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 21 → 31 of 61
Enterprise▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 10 → 8 of 62

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
CIAM0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 21 → 29 of 70
Workforce identity0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 24 → 27 of 44

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated SSOJet across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels3
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained7 labels2
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Very small team needing flat budgeting → a flat-rate product like SSOJet can be cheaper than per-user pricing.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Workforce identity · budget prompt · alternative
“WorkOS and SSOJet lead for adding enterprise SSO and SCIM as a fast layer” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CIAM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SSOJet, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SSOJet was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Auth016 of 305Not among the top eight
WorkOS14 of 302Not among the top eight
Frontegg10 of 304Not among the top eight
Ping Identity9 of 300Not among the top eight
Microsoft Entra ID8 of 303Not among the top eight
JumpCloud7 of 303Not among the top eight
Okta Workforce Identity7 of 302Not among the top eight
FusionAuth6 of 302Not among the top eight
Okta6 of 300Not among the top eight
Stytch6 of 300Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SSOJet. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named SSOJet and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

securityboulevard.com25
ssojet.comYour site17
startwithidentity.com17
cybersecuritynews.com13
guideflow.com12
guptadeepak.com11
expertinsights.com10
workos.com10
mojoauth.com8
checkthat.ai7

113 of the 130 domain citations in answers naming SSOJet came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

ssojet.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SSOJet takes 0% of first choices and Frontegg takes 21%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “customer identity platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “customer identity platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
40 a month (“ssojet”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 9,629 a month
Searches its site ranks for
7,900 · 97 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,237
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 29 of 70 in CIAM
Segment leader
21%
Frontegg
First choices
5 across its categories
Named in
30 answers
Its own site cited
in 30 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on ssojet.com
2,186
subdomains included
Content
939
counted in the table below
Documentation
246
Product · Integration
11 · 99
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog644412026-09-28
Glossary or explainer8912026-08-25
Comparison80112026-08-05
Report or ebook6302024-06-01
News or press43132026-08-05
Case study902024-06-01
Template or tool942026-08-05
Conference or event2undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page ssojet.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow SSOJet

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SSOJet is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Add Enterprise SSO Without Rebuilding Your Auth
For
B2B SaaS companies serving mid-market and enterprise customers
Price stated
Free Plan; Business Plan; Enterprise Plan; SSO starting at $79/month ssojet.com
Starting price
79 ssojet.com
Free plan or trial
Start building for free with full access to all Business-plan features, no credit card required. The Free plan is permanent and covers unlimited users, unlimited monthly active users and unlimited tenants. ssojet.com
Integrations claimed
100 ssojet.com
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IISOC 2GDPRHIPAAISO 27001CCPAHIPAA/BAASOC 2 Type II certification
Hosting
WorldwideUSCAEUUKINJPSG
Customers named
GrackerAIPublish7Social9MailazyFidioraMojoIndieVokshaLynkdog

What SSOJet's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ssojet.com, ssojet.com/pricing, ssojet.com/docs/en/references/security-compliances/security, ssojet.com/use-cases, ssojet.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SSOJet's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SSOJet, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SSOJet by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where SSOJet is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name SSOJet, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ssojet.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.