IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › SSOJet · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

SSOJet

26Judge labels

3First choices

4Negative labels

11 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SSOJet was named 8 times in CIAM and 2 other categories, where Auth0 led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business10 of 52

under the label threshold

Mid-market21 of 74

under the label threshold

Enterprise10 of 60

under the label threshold

In ciam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SSOJet for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer identity and access management	Identity and access	0%	21 of 74	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Auth0 at 22%
Workforce identity and SSO	Identity and access	0%	26 of 48	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID at 36%
Identity governance	Identity and access	0%	44 of 77	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Lumos at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SSOJet yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SSOJet across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct12 labels3

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“A good option for companies that prioritize SaaS integration speed and developer-first startup growth.” Llama 4 Maverick · Workforce identity · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“SSOJet offers a flat $49/month with unlimited monthly active users” GLM 4.7 FlashX · IGA · budget prompt · alternative

“look into bolt-on solutions like SSOJet or ScaleKit” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CIAM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“only if you are actually buying *embedded B2B SaaS identity infrastructure* for your product, not internal employee identity” Perplexity Sonar · Workforce identity · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SSOJet, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SSOJet was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Auth018 of 265Not in the top three

WorkOS17 of 263Not in the top three

Stytch11 of 260Not in the top three

Frontegg10 of 265Not in the top three

Clerk9 of 262Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra External ID8 of 262Not in the top three

Descope8 of 261Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra ID7 of 261Not in the top three

Ping Identity7 of 260Not in the top three

Amazon Cognito6 of 260Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SSOJet. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 26 answers that named SSOJet and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

startwithidentity.com19

securityboulevard.com15

loginradius.com14

workos.com12

expertinsights.com10

ssojet.comYour site9

guideflow.com7

worldmetrics.org7

guptadeepak.com6

corma.io5

Ninety-five of the 104 domain citations in answers naming SSOJet came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

loginradius.com/blog/identity/top-ciam-for-small-and-medium-businesses9

securityboulevard.com/2025/12/top-12-identity-and-access-management-platforms9

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/top-customer-identity-and-access-managem8

startwithidentity.com/articles/top-7-ciam-platforms-b2b-saas8

workos.com/blog/top-ciam-providers-in-20268

guideflow.com/blog/ciam-software6

securityboulevard.com/2026/08/top-5-enterprise-ciam-platforms-in-2026-in-depth-comparison6

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-ciam-for-startups5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SSOJet's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SSOJet, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ssojet.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.