Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 22 → 5 of 114
1 category · RankedGreyNoise
16Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Threat intel for small business buyers
Rank 56 of 119 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 126
4%10 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market56 of 119
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise41 of 83
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In threat intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named GreyNoise for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat intelligence platforms | Security operations | 0% | 56 of 119 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by MISP at 12% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, GreyNoise held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Threat intel · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 13 → 51 of 111
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 41 of 78, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat intel | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 56 of 119 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated GreyNoise across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated GreyNoise across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labels1
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative4 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for Reducing Alert Fatigue... The Catch: It is an enrichment tool, not a full-featured TIP” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Threat intel · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“GreyNoise user feedback highlights that it's simple to use but "doesn't go deep in threat actor attribution," which may be fine for some teams and a deal-breaker for others” GPT-5.4 mini · Threat intel · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as GreyNoise, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GreyNoise was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as GreyNoise, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GreyNoise was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GreyNoise. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 16 answers that named GreyNoise and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
flare.io12
learn.g2.com11
upguard.com8
g2.com7
wiz.io6
b2breviews.com5
gartner.com5
underdefense.com5
us.fitgap.com5
cloudsek.com4
Sixty-eight of the sixty-eight domain citations in answers naming GreyNoise came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
greynoise.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, GreyNoise takes 0% of first choices and MISP takes 12%.ShowHide
Search and answers
greynoise.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, GreyNoise takes 0% of first choices and MISP takes 12%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “threat intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “threat intelligence platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,900 a month (“greynoise”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 41 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,797 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 453 · 35 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,861
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 56 of 119 in threat intel
Segment leader
12%
MISP
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 16 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 14 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on greynoise.io
933
subdomains included
Content
526
counted in the table below
Documentation
202
Product · Integration
16 · 53
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 410 | 11 | 2026-09-28 | SOAR, SIEM | |
| News or press | 41 | undated | SIEM | ||
| Conference or event | 29 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 26 | 0 | 2024-10-31 | SOAR | |
| Podcast or video | 10 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 4 | undated | |||
| Case study | 3 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 2 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Swarming against citrix 0 day exploitation blog
- 2026-09-21Open season on kapibala attacker steals government records wordpress exploitation blog
- 2026-09-09Ai orchestrated campaign against papercut ng mf blog
- 2026-08-31Greynoise crowdstrike falcon ng siem charlotte agentic soar blog
- 2026-08-28Threat actors posing as ai crawlers blog
- 2026-08-17New way to navigate greynoise blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- October 27, 2026it-sa Expo & CongressNuremberg
- October 26, 2026FS-ISAC Americas Fall SummitAustin · attended
- August 3, 2026Meet at BlackHat USA 2026Las Vegas · attended
As the event pages on greynoise.io state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page greynoise.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow GreyNoise
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
GreyNoise is its own company.ShowHide
The company
GreyNoise is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Real-Time Network Threat Intelligence
- For
- Enterprise and Government; Small and Mid-Sized Businesses
- Price stated
- Talk to us about pricing greynoise.io/plans
- Free plan or trial
- Free community tier; full-feature trial greynoise.io/plans
- Integrations claimed
- 80 greynoise.io · 4 greynoise.io/plans pages disagree
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, certifications, hosting, customers
What GreyNoise's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: greynoise.io, greynoise.io/plans, greynoise.io/products/platform, greynoise.io/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GreyNoise's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GreyNoise, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for GreyNoise by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where GreyNoise is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name GreyNoise, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.