1 category · RankedPanorays
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Third-party risk management | Security operations | 10% | 2 of 72 | 17% | 35 | accepted challenger |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best third-party risk management platform for a mid-market B2B company is UpGuard, Panorays, or Vanta.” Llama 4 Maverick · TPRM · direct prompt · first choice
“Panorays and UpGuard stand out for continuous monitoring + vendor‑friendly assessments.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · TPRM · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend UpGuard or Panorays as the starting point” Kimi K2 · TPRM · direct prompt · first choice
“points to UpGuard or Panorays as the strongest options” Qwen 3.7 Flash · TPRM · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Limited customization options, poor reporting capabilities, lack of clarity in risk assessment processes, inefficient risk management due to false positives” GLM 4.7 FlashX · TPRM · negative prompt · hard negative
“As seen with some platforms like Panorays (users report lack of clarity in risk assessments, limited customization, and inefficient processes)” MiniMax M2.5 · TPRM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Questionnaire-heavy platforms such as Panorays if your program depends on highly accurate vendor participation” Perplexity Sonar · TPRM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Panorays (Use with Caution) ... user feedback often highlights "black box" risks” Qwen 3.7 Flash · TPRM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 64 of the 72 answers that named Panorays and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
250 of the 280 domain citations in answers naming Panorays came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Panorays's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Panorays, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at panorays.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.