Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 18 of 69
4 categories · RankedPanorays
50Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in TPRM for mid-market buyers
Rank 6 of 87 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 26 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Panorays →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business19 of 71
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market6 of 87
2%26 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise23 of 72
0%11 labels
accepted challenger
In tprm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Panorays for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Third-party risk management | Security operations | 2% | 6 of 87 | 0% | 26 | accepted challenger | ▼−8Since September 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Attack surface management | Security operations | 0% | 48 of 100 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 49% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Cyber risk quantification | Security operations | 0% | 97 of 116 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CyberSaint CyberStrong at 25% | |
| SaaS security posture management | Security operations | 0% | 74 of 95 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wing Security at 30% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Panorays held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · TPRM · by segment
Mid-market▼−8Since September 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 2 → 6 of 82
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 21 of 68
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPRM | 10% | 2% | ▼−8Since September 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 6 of 87 |
| ASM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 48 of 100, unchanged |
| Cyber risk quant | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 97 of 116, unchanged |
| SSPM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 74 of 95, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Panorays across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Panorays across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labelsNone
Paraphrase15 labels1
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative50 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I would recommend Panorays or UpGuard” MiniMax M2.5 · TPRM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Panorays is especially useful for mid-sized or enterprise teams building mature vendor risk management programs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ASM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Evaluate Panorays if you need the deepest technical assessments and fastest time-to-insight for new vendors.” Kimi K2 · TPRM · direct prompt · alternative
“If you prioritize speed of deployment and ease of use, Panorays is highly recommended.” Mistral Small · TPRM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Panorays, over the 50 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Panorays was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Panorays, over the 50 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Panorays was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Panorays. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 49 of the 50 answers that named Panorays and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
upguard.com39
panorays.comYour site24
vanta.com24
bitsight.com22
coruzant.com22
learn.g2.com22
mitratech.com21
riskledger.com19
sprinto.com17
atlassystems.com16
202 of the 226 domain citations in answers naming Panorays came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
panorays.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Panorays takes 2% of first choices and UpGuard takes 55%.ShowHide
Search and answers
panorays.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Panorays takes 2% of first choices and UpGuard takes 55%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “third-party risk management platform”
5
Position for “third-party risk management platforms”
6
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“panorays”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 21,228 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,587 · 210 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,760
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 6 of 87 in TPRM
Segment leader
55%
UpGuard
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 50 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 49 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on panorays.com
3,596
subdomains included
Content
501
counted in the table below
Documentation
9
Product · Integration
20 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 330 | 12 | 2026-09-28 | TPRM, ASM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 60 | 0 | 2026-06-10 | TPRM, ITAM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 34 | 0 | 2026-06-17 | TPRM | |
| Report or ebook | 34 | 1 | 2026-08-23 | TPRM | |
| Case study | 25 | 0 | 2026-06-01 | ||
| Comparison | 14 | 0 | 2025-11-26 | ASM | |
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-05-09 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated | TPRM | ||
| News or press | 1 | 0 | 2025-12-01 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Shadow ai third party risk blog
- 2026-09-01F1 panorays cyber risk partnership blog
- 2026-08-23Risk realities reshaping 2026 report or ebook
- 2026-08-17Panorays launches cyber risk quantification blog
- 2026-08-03The three due diligence mistakes hurting your team blog
- 2026-07-29Healthcare supply chain risk management blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page panorays.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Panorays
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Panorays is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Panorays is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Third-Party Cyber Risk. Solved. End-to-End Vendor Risk Management, Powered by Native AI
- For
- CISOs
- Price stated
- Get a Quote panorays.com
- Free plan or trial
- Get Started Free panorays.com
- Certifications
- ISO/IEC 42001SOC 2FedRAMPISO/IEC 42001:2023SOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001:2022
- Customers named
- Howden Group HoldingsAppsFlyerTelitLeading Confectionery and Food CompanyMarkerstudyLemonadeFreudenberg Home and Cleaning SolutionsCPI
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting
What Panorays's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: panorays.com, panorays.com/pricing, panorays.com/security, panorays.com/platform/remediation, panorays.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Panorays's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Panorays, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Panorays by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Panorays is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Panorays, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.