| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Third-party risk management | Security operations | 2% | 8 of 72 | 26% | 23 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Look for a cloud-native, modern SaaS platform designed for agility (e.g., Prevalent, OneTrust...” Qwen 3.7 Flash · TPRM · scale prompt · first choice
“Prevalent is often recommended for mid-market organizations that need a complete third-party risk workflow” Mistral Small · TPRM · direct prompt · alternative
“If you need more hands-on support or are in financial services, consider Prevalent or Venminder.” Kimi K2 · TPRM · direct prompt · alternative
“The strongest TPRM platforms for 2026 are Mitratech Prevalent, UpGuard, and SecurityScorecard” Claude Haiku 4.5 · TPRM · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Caution level: Medium-High — for teams expecting an easy out-of-the-box setup.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · TPRM · negative prompt · hard negative
“entry-level costs ranging from $10,000 to $20,000+ per year, making them inaccessible for early-stage companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · TPRM · budget prompt · soft negative
“(overkill for most mid-size) → OneTrust, BitSight, Prevalent” DeepSeek V4 Flash · TPRM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Prevalent (Note: Can be enterprise-heavy/costly)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · TPRM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 66 of the 70 answers that named Prevalent and are not a share of its labels.
287 of the 287 domain citations in answers naming Prevalent came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Prevalent's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Prevalent, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at prevalent.net is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.