Index › Products › Oasis · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Oasis

14Judge labels

2First choices

4Negative labels

10 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oasis was named 4 times in NHI management, where JumpCloud led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business102 of 125

under the label threshold

Mid-market15 of 128

under the label threshold

Enterprise14 of 96

under the label threshold

In nhi management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Oasis for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Non-human identity management	Identity and access	2%	15 of 128	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by JumpCloud at 14%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oasis yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oasis across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	0	1	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Entro Starter Pack or Oasis Starter Pack via AWS Marketplace is the most frequently cited mid-market entry point.” Muse Glimmer 30B · NHI management · direct prompt · first choice

“Cyera/Oasis if data security and AI-agent governance are central” GPT-6 Luna · NHI management · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Astrix, Oasis, and Token describe discovery/governance and remediation capabilities; that isn't, by itself, proof they can replace your existing credential infrastructure.” GPT-6 Luna · NHI management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oasis, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oasis was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Astrix Security8 of 140Not among the top eight

Entro Security8 of 140Not among the top eight

HashiCorp Vault7 of 140Not among the top eight

Aembit6 of 142Not among the top eight

JumpCloud5 of 141Not among the top eight

CyberArk Identity Security Platform4 of 140Not among the top eight

SailPoint3 of 141Not among the top eight

Token Security3 of 141Not among the top eight

Venafi3 of 141Not among the top eight

Akeyless3 of 140Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oasis. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named Oasis and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com7

securityboulevard.com7

startupstash.com7

nhimg.org5

startwithidentity.com5

akeyless.io4

cybersecmanager.net4

cybersecuritynews.com4

idsync.com4

oneidentity.com4

No domain is on file for Oasis, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/top-nhi-management-solutions7

startupstash.com/top-non-human-identity-management-platforms7

securityboulevard.com/2026/06/top-non-human-identity-nhi-management-tools-for-20265

cybersecmanager.net/best-non-human-identity-management-platforms4

wwt.com/blog/non-human-identity-security-platform-assessment4

akeyless.io/blog/top-5-non-human-identity-management-tools-for-20263

idsync.com/compare3

majorkeytech.com/blogs/best-iam-solutions3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Oasis stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 368,000 a month (“oasis”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 65,433 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 15 of 128 in NHI management

Segment leader

14%

JumpCloud

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 14 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Oasis

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oasis; a claim can dispute any of them.

Cyera/Oasis 1

Follow Oasis

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oasis's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oasis, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oasis by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Oasis is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oasis, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.