Every category where a model named Token Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Non-human identity management	Identity and access	5%	8 of 128	9%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Token Security yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Token Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	3	0	3
Mistral Small	1	0	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	1	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	0	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels2

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative12 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative5 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Oasis Security, Token Security, and Clutch are highlighted as more purpose-built for NHI management, so they may be safer choices” Mistral Small · NHI management · negative prompt · first choice

“Go with Token Security — it's purpose-built, independent, and scales well for mid-tier orgs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NHI management · direct prompt · first choice

“My default pick: Token Security” GPT-6 Luna · NHI management · direct prompt · first choice

“Machine-first identity security with a focus on AI agents and machine identities... an emerging vendor, so integration coverage is still maturing.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NHI management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Token Security | ~$50K–$100K/yr starter packages” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NHI management · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Token Security, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Token Security was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Oasis Security25 of 315Not among the top eight

Entro Security24 of 311Compare →

Astrix Security21 of 312Not among the top eight

Akeyless15 of 312Compare →

CyberArk Identity Security Platform14 of 311Not among the top eight

HashiCorp Vault14 of 311Compare →

Aembit11 of 312Compare →

Okta8 of 311Not among the top eight

Clutch8 of 310Not among the top eight

SailPoint8 of 310Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Token Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 31 answers that named Token Security and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com22

wwt.com16

akeyless.io15

startupstash.com15

securityboulevard.com14

oneidentity.com13

blog.gitguardian.com12

startwithidentity.com12

nhimg.org10

scworld.com10

139 of the 139 domain citations in answers naming Token Security came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/top-nhi-management-solutions21

wwt.com/blog/non-human-identity-security-platform-assessment16

startupstash.com/top-non-human-identity-management-platforms15

akeyless.io/blog/top-5-non-human-identity-management-tools-for-202613

oneidentity.com/learn/top-non-human-identity-and-agentic-ai-security-tools.aspx12

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-non-human-identity-security-platforms11

blog.gitguardian.com/nhi-security-tools10

securityboulevard.com/2026/06/top-non-human-identity-nhi-management-tools-for-202610

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

token.security is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Token Security takes 5% of first choices and JumpCloud takes 14%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “non-human identity management platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best non-human identity management platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,600 a month (“token security”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 481 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,661 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 670 · 21 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 844
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

18 ads · 9 image, 8 text, 1 video · 14 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2025, as Token Security INC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 12 in the year, 6 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 8 of 128 in NHI management

Segment leader

14%

JumpCloud

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 31 answers
Its own site cited: in 31 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on token.security

313

subdomains included

Content

255

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

16 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	143	109	2026-09-30	NHI management, IGA
News or press	86	undated		IGA
Glossary or explainer	10	8	2026-09-30	Secrets
Webinar or virtual event	4	0	2025-12-25
Report or ebook	4	0	2025-09-14
Comparison	3	3	2026-09-06
Case study	2	0	2026-06-25
Conference or event	1	undated
Template or tool	1	undated
Podcast or video	1	0	2026-05-29

Most recent

2026-09-30Agentic ai attack vectors emerging threats and defense strategies blog
2026-09-30Agentic ai lifecycle management from training to decommissioning securely blog
2026-09-30Agentic ai threat simulation predicting unintended behaviors before they happen blog
2026-09-30Blog ai agent security fails identity configuration problem blog
2026-09-30Cloud security challenges risks threats and ai driven complexity blog
2026-09-30Collaborative AI Agents: Securing Multi-Agent Networks | Token Security blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page token.security exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Token Security

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Token Security; a claim can dispute any of them.

Clutch / Token Security 1

Follow Token Security

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Token Security is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI Agent & Non-Human Identity Security Platform
token.security
For: security teams
token.security
Certifications: ISO/IEC 27001:2022SOC 2 Type 2
Customers named: HiBobUdemyGEHAKlaviyoLemonadePROSDayforceAlphaSense
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Token Security's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: token.security, trust.token.security, token.security/use-cases/ai-security, token.security/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Token Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Token Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Token Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Token Security is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Token Security, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.