| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Embedded analytics | Data platform | 2% | 21 of 72 | 50% | 24 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you're already in the Microsoft ecosystem → Power BI Embedded (lowest cost, good integration).” MiniMax M2.5 · Embedded analytics · direct prompt · first choice
“If you're a large enterprise embedding into internal workflows and value the Microsoft or Google ecosystems, Power BI and Looker remain strong choices.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Embedded analytics · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Power BI/Tableau if you are a traditional enterprise reporting internal data and need quick deployment with minimal coding.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Embedded analytics · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Tableau or Power BI if you want mature BI ecosystems and rich dashboard embedding.” Perplexity Sonar · Embedded analytics · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Legacy BI tools repackaged as "embedded" (Tableau, Power BI, Looker, Qlik)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Embedded analytics · negative prompt · hard negative
“they are generally poor choices for customer-facing SaaS products” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Embedded analytics · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“built for internal business intelligence first and "bolted-on" embedding later, which often leads to rigid iframe designs and cost-prohibitive per-user licensing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Embedded analytics · direct prompt · soft negative
“Power BI — commonly iframe-based with limited customization and more suited to quick embedding than deeply native experiences.” Perplexity Sonar · Embedded analytics · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 66 of the 71 answers that named Microsoft Power BI Embedded and are not a share of its labels.
311 of the 311 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Power BI Embedded came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Power BI Embedded's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Power BI Embedded, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Power BI Embedded by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: