AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Cube · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Cube

49Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Embedded analytics for mid-market buyers
Rank 8 of 72 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 20 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Cube →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In embedded analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Cube for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Embedded analyticsData platform2%8 of 720%20accepted challenger
IT financial managementIT operations and endpoint0%39 of 1590%5under 10 labels · led by Nicus ITFM Platform at 9%
Data virtualizationData platform0%53 of 990%1under 10 labels · led by Denodo at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cube yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cube across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash23106
Perplexity Sonar13004
Grok 4.1 Fast10203
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash10001
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200202
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.501102
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01203

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase9 labels1
Comparative14 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained11 labels1
Negative5 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative49 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Cube: An industry-standard "headless" semantic layer with an open-source core. It is excellent for high-concurrency, complex multi-tenancy, and has a native AI-agent API.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Embedded analytics · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Cube or Omni if you are building a modern SaaS application that needs scalable, highly secure multi-tenancy” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Embedded analytics · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Cube if you need strong multi-tenant isolation and row-level security for SaaS embedding.” Perplexity Sonar · Embedded analytics · comparative prompt · first choice
“were built from the ground up for embedding” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Embedded analytics · negative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cube, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cube was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Looker21 of 490Not among the top eight
Tableau18 of 490Not among the top eight
Microsoft Power BI Embedded16 of 491Not among the top eight
Omni12 of 493Not among the top eight
Sigma11 of 491Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cube. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 48 of the 49 answers that named Cube and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cube.devYour site30
holistics.io27
omni.co27
domo.com20
embeddable.com19
zoho.com19
luzmo.com16
g2.com15
gartner.com14
peliqan.io14

171 of the 201 domain citations in answers naming Cube came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

cube.dev ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Cube takes 2% of first choices and Metabase takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “embedded analytics platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “embedded analytics platforms”
2
Searches for its name, Google
90,500 a month (“cube”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
152,613 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 5,632 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,322 · 104 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,587
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
9 ads · 9 text · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2023, as Cube Dev, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 3 in the year, 6 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 8 of 72 in embedded analytics
Segment leader
22%
Metabase
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
49 answers
Its own site cited
in 48 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on cube.dev
1,824
subdomains included
Content
932
counted in the table below
Documentation
553
Product · Integration
9 · 63
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog395452026-09-22Embedded analytics, ETL
Template or tool305undated
Conference or event150undatedEmbedded analytics, Data warehouses
Case study30undatedEmbedded analytics
Glossary or explainer21112026-09-28Embedded analytics
Report or ebook1402022-09-15
Comparison1352026-08-04ETL, Embedded analytics
Webinar or virtual event4undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page cube.dev exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Cube

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Cube; a claim can dispute any of them.
Cube (formerly Cube.js) 3

Follow Cube

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cube's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cube, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cube by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Cube is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cube, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cube.dev is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.