AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Metabase · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Metabase

113Judge labels
35First choices
17Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
46% in Embedded analytics for small business buyers
Rank 1 of 72 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 40 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Metabase →
By buyer segmentA small-business product: leader at small business, not named at enterprise.
In embedded analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Metabase for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Embedded analyticsData platform22%1 of 7212%40accepted challenger
Telemetry pipelinesIT operations and endpoint0%65 of 1240%1under 10 labels · led by OpenTelemetry Collector at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Metabase yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Metabase across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502013
GPT-5.4 mini12104
Gemini 3.5 Flash03003
Perplexity Sonar11002
Grok 4.1 Fast10001
Mistral Small10102
DeepSeek V4 Flash01124
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash02002
Kimi K221014
GLM 4.7 FlashX21003
MiniMax M2.511215
GPT-6 Luna22004
Muse Glimmer 30B11103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct21 labels9
Paraphrase20 labels9
Comparative21 labels7not counted in share
Budget-constrained30 labels16
Scale-constrained7 labels1
Negative14 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative113 labels in all, every segment counted; 35 of the 43 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Metabase (especially with static embeds) and Querio are the top recommendations for companies with limited budgets” Mistral Small · Embedded analytics · budget prompt · first choice
“the best embedded analytics platform is likely the open-source self-hosted version of Metabase, which is completely free” Grok 4.1 Fast · Embedded analytics · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with Metabase if you want to test the waters cost-effectively and have engineering resources” Kimi K2 · Embedded analytics · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the strongest low-cost choice is usually Metabase if you can use the open-source edition” Perplexity Sonar · Embedded analytics · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“self-hosted Metabase for embedding (security, performance)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Embedded analytics · negative prompt · hard negative
“often cited as the fastest path to a first embedded dashboard but hits limits on serious multi-tenant isolation” Kimi K2 · Embedded analytics · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Deep embedding features gated to paid tiers; multi-tenant isolation weaker than dedicated embedded platforms” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Embedded analytics · comparative prompt · soft negative
“More affordable open-source option, though some embedding features are paywalled” MiniMax M2.5 · Embedded analytics · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Metabase, over the 113 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Metabase was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Luzmo50 of 11311Compare →
Looker49 of 1132Not among the top eight
Tableau39 of 1130Not among the top eight
Power BI Embedded38 of 1131Not among the top eight
Microsoft Power BI Embedded26 of 1133Not among the top eight
Zoho Analytics26 of 1131Not among the top eight
Embeddable22 of 1132Not among the top eight
Tableau Embedded Analytics19 of 1130Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Metabase. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 104 of the 113 answers that named Metabase and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

holistics.io62
luzmo.com48
omni.co46
zoho.com43
embeddable.com40
peliqan.io40
metabase.comYour site38
cube.dev35
draxlr.com35
querio.ai31

380 of the 418 domain citations in answers naming Metabase came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Metabase stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “embedded analytics platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “embedded analytics platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
14,800 a month (“metabase”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
337 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 60,151 a month
Searches its site ranks for
4,609 · 470 in the top three
Sites linking to it
6,548
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
24 ads · 24 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2025, as Metabase, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 12 in the year, 12 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
22%
rank 1 of 72 in embedded analytics
First choices
35
across its categories
Named in
113 answers
Its own site cited
in 104 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on metabase.com
10,136
subdomains included
Content
585
counted in the table below
Documentation
496
Product · Integration
26 · 304
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Glossary or explainer32402025-05-15
Blog11252026-08-27
Case study45undated
Conference or event4462026-09-29
Comparison4112026-07-13
Webinar or virtual event902025-06-25
Report or ebook702024-07-04
Template or tool102024-09-22
Podcast or video102025-04-21
News or press1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page metabase.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Metabase

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Metabase; a claim can dispute any of them.
Metabase (Open Source) 2Metabase Pro 2Metabase (Open Source Edition) 1Metabase (open-source) 1

Follow Metabase

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Metabase is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Open source AI analytics you can verify; Open source Business Intelligence and Embedded Analytics
For
Self-service analytics for your team; customer-facing analytics; developers building in-product analytics
Price stated
Free 14-day trial metabase.com
Starting price
0 metabase.com
Free plan or trial
Free 14-day trial metabase.com
Integrations claimed
20 metabase.com/pricing
Certifications
SOC 2 Type 1SOC 2 Type 2GDPRCCPA CertificateSOC 2 Type IISOC 1CCPASOC2 Type II
Hosting
USEuropeLatin AmericaAsia-Pacific
Customers named
Cal.comPathriseSyncteraComptoir de L’orLime TechnologiesStructionSiteThe LobbyMotohunt

What Metabase's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: metabase.com, metabase.com/pricing, trust.metabase.com, metabase.com/product/pro, metabase.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Metabase's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Metabase, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Metabase by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Metabase is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Metabase, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at metabase.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Metabase is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

AI models recommend Metabase first in Embedded analytics this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
AI models' first choice in Embedded analytics, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/it-data/embedded-analytics/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/metabase--embedded-analytics-wide.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Embedded analytics, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Embedded analytics standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
AI models' first choice in Embedded analytics, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/it-data/embedded-analytics/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/metabase--embedded-analytics-square.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Embedded analytics, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Embedded analytics standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
AI models' first choice in Embedded analytics, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/it-data/embedded-analytics/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/metabase--embedded-analytics-compact.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Embedded analytics, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Embedded analytics standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.