AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › ThoughtSpot Embedded · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

ThoughtSpot Embedded

94Judge labels
4First choices
31Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Embedded analytics for mid-market buyers
Rank 6 of 72 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 19% of its 36 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ThoughtSpot Embedded →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In embedded analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ThoughtSpot Embedded for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Embedded analyticsData platform5%6 of 7219%36accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ThoughtSpot Embedded yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ThoughtSpot Embedded across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini02103
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar11013
Grok 4.1 Fast10135
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash11013
Llama 4 Maverick03003
Qwen 3.7 Flash02103
Kimi K202002
GLM 4.7 FlashX11013
MiniMax M2.502215
GPT-6 Luna03003
Muse Glimmer 30B10203

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labels1
Paraphrase10 labels2
Comparative24 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained12 labelsNone
Scale-constrained14 labels1
Negative18 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative94 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I would choose ThoughtSpot Embedded for a typical mid-market B2B company that wants a mature platform and quicker adoption.” Perplexity Sonar · Embedded analytics · direct prompt · first choice
“ThoughtSpot is positioned as an AI-native analytics platform... ThoughtSpot wins on pure AI and ease of use” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Embedded analytics · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best overall balance for product-led customer facing analytics: Sigma Embedded or ThoughtSpot Embedded” Muse Glimmer 30B · Embedded analytics · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“platforms like Sisense, GoodData, ThoughtSpot, and Explo were purpose-built for that use case” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Embedded analytics · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid: Looker, Domo, ThoughtSpot, and GoodData if budget is your primary constraint” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Embedded analytics · budget prompt · hard negative
“ThoughtSpot — embedded but still iframe/API oriented, with limitations around flexibility and governance overhead” Perplexity Sonar · Embedded analytics · negative prompt · soft negative
“were primarily built for internal analyst teams, not customer-facing embedding” Grok 4.1 Fast · Embedded analytics · negative prompt · soft negative
“enterprise options like Sisense/ThoughtSpot ($50K+ ACV)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Embedded analytics · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ThoughtSpot Embedded, over the 94 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ThoughtSpot Embedded was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Looker56 of 945Not among the top eight
Power BI Embedded38 of 941Not among the top eight
Tableau38 of 941Not among the top eight
Microsoft Power BI Embedded33 of 945Not among the top eight
Qrvey23 of 942Not among the top eight
Tableau Embedded Analytics23 of 940Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ThoughtSpot Embedded. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 92 of the 94 answers that named ThoughtSpot Embedded and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

holistics.io60
omni.co57
zoho.com50
peliqan.io47
thoughtspot.comYour site47
cube.dev44
luzmo.com42
embeddable.com36
querio.ai33
sisense.com30

399 of the 446 domain citations in answers naming ThoughtSpot Embedded came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

thoughtspot.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ThoughtSpot Embedded takes 5% of first choices and Metabase takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “embedded analytics platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “embedded analytics platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
50 a month (“thoughtspot embedded”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 207,491 a month
Searches its site ranks for
14,489 · 1,192 in the top three
Sites linking to it
7,441
Paid Google search
5 searches its ads show for, about 61 clicks and $2,050 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 64 text, 48 image, 8 video · 75 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2023, as ThoughtSpot, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 114 in the year, 6 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
5%
rank 6 of 72 in embedded analytics
Segment leader
22%
Metabase
First choices
4 across its categories
Named in
94 answers
Its own site cited
in 92 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on thoughtspot.com
8,927
subdomains included
Content
913
counted in the table below
Documentation
6,304
Product · Integration
44 · 15
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog32712026-09-24
Report or ebook181undated
News or press178undated
Comparison8802026-02-20
Glossary or explainer7242026-09-22
Case study3702016-11-11
Conference or event1202026-06-11
Webinar or virtual event11undated
Podcast or video642026-09-29
Template or tool1undated

Most recent

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on thoughtspot.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page thoughtspot.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as ThoughtSpot Embedded

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ThoughtSpot Embedded; a claim can dispute any of them.
ThoughtSpot 24Thoughtspot Embedded 3

Follow ThoughtSpot Embedded

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ThoughtSpot Embedded is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Intelligence, Embedded Effortlessly
For
Product Teams & Developers
Price stated
Free for 1 year; Flexible pricing models aligned with your use case & GTM requirements thoughtspot.com/pricing
Starting price
Free for 1 year thoughtspot.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Free trial thoughtspot.com
Integrations claimed
6 thoughtspot.com
Certifications
SOC1SOC2SOC3ISO 27001CSA StarHIPPAGDPREU-US DPF
Customers named
ZencargoBramblesMidas PharmaBooking.comSephoraAct-OnAsk BOSCOAustin Capital Bank
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting

What ThoughtSpot Embedded's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: thoughtspot.com, thoughtspot.com/pricing, trust.thoughtspot.com, thoughtspot.com/product/model, thoughtspot.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ThoughtSpot Embedded's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ThoughtSpot Embedded, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ThoughtSpot Embedded by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ThoughtSpot Embedded is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ThoughtSpot Embedded, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at thoughtspot.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.