| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Embedded analytics | Data platform | 13% | 3 of 72 | 3% | 29 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend Luzmo or Explo if your top priority is fast, white-labeled dashboard embedding with minimal engineering overhead.” Perplexity Sonar · Embedded analytics · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Dedicated embedded analytics platforms (like Luzmo, Toucan, Reveal, Cube) were built from the ground up for embedding.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Embedded analytics · negative prompt · first choice
“If you want to get it done in a week with a beautiful, fully white-labeled UX and zero developer headache: Go with Luzmo.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Embedded analytics · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Reveal BI and Luzmo frequently win for product teams needing SDK control without enterprise overhead” Kimi K2 · Embedded analytics · scale prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“avoid per-viewer pricing like Metabase Pro or Luzmo if user base grows fast” Grok 4.1 Fast · Embedded analytics · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 84 of the 84 answers that named Luzmo and are not a share of its labels.
369 of the 424 domain citations in answers naming Luzmo came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 442 | 11 | 2026-09-28 | Data warehouses | |
| Glossary or explainer | 286 | 0 | 2024-04-18 | ||
| Comparison | 71 | 14 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Report or ebook | 70 | 0 | 2024-11-20 | ||
| Case study | 28 | 1 | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 27 | 1 | 2026-09-03 | ||
| Conference or event | 5 | 0 | 2026-06-15 | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | 1 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Every page luzmo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Luzmo's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: luzmo.com, luzmo.com/pricing, trust.luzmo.com, luzmo.com/solutions/telecom, luzmo.com/resources-category/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Luzmo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Luzmo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Luzmo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Luzmo is among the products AI models recommend first in Embedded analytics this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.