3 categories · RankedPega
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robotic process automation | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 19 of 68 | 22% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Power Automate at 51% | |
| Process mining | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 27 of 61 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Apromore at 19% | |
| Workflow orchestration | Data platform | 0% | 67 of 79 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Prefect at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Pega across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Pega if: Your primary goal is optimizing customer-facing processes through real-time automation.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Process mining · comparative prompt · alternative
“A leader in process orchestration that focuses heavily on the "now what?" of process mining.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Process mining · comparative prompt · alternative
“excels in integrating RPA with BPM for complex workflows” Mistral Small · RPA · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Has a steep learning curve and needs serious IT backing. Steep cost and implementation complexity are concerns” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Orchestration · negative prompt · hard negative
“Pega RPA will feel overly complex, heavy, and expensive.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · RPA · negative prompt · soft negative
“Pegasystems with "declining licenses"” Muse Glimmer 30B · RPA · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pega, over the 56 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pega was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 54 of the 56 answers that named Pega and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
127 of the 127 domain citations in answers naming Pega came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
pega.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pega takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Power Automate takes 51%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 8,100 a month (“pega”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4,513 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 39,887 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 7,728 · 599 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,374
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 56 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 54 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,785 | 25 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| News or press | 553 | 0 | 2026-01-16 | ||
| Conference or event | 316 | 20 | 2026-11-30 | ||
| Case study | 307 | 12 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 19 | 2 | 2026-08-07 | ||
| Podcast or video | 12 | 0 | 2026-04-21 | ||
| Comparison | 6 | 1 | 2026-07-06 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 1 | 2026-08-24 | ||
| Report or ebook | 5 | 1 | 2026-07-31 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 2 | 2026-07-27 |
Most recent
- 2026-11-30Aws reinvent 2026 conference or event
- 2026-10-13Dial ai dont bet business conference or event
- 2026-10-12Pega cloud blr expert circle meetup conference or event
- 2026-10-0811 customer engagement summit toronto conference or event
- 2026-09-24Conversation greg kihlstr%C3%B6m and tara dezao customer journey management blog
- 2026-09-23Three keys enterprise ai success blog
Events in person
- June 13, 2027 to June 15, 2027PegaWorld 2027Las Vegas · hosts
- October 20, 2026PEGAInnovate TorontoDesign Exchange, Toronto, Canada · hosted
- September 10, 2026PEGAInnovate Stockholm 2026Grand Hôtel, Stockholm · hosted
- August 27, 2026PEGAInnovate Tokyo 2026ANA Intercontinental Hotel Tokyo, Tokyo · hosted
As the event pages on pega.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page pega.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Pega
Follow Pega
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Pega is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The leading AI-powered platform for enterprise transformation
- For
- enterprise
- Free plan or trial
- Platform Trial pega.com
- Integrations claimed
- 16 pega.com/products/decision-hub/integrations
- Certifications
- SOC 1 Type IISOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 42001ISO 22301:2019ISO 9001CSAPCI
- Customers named
- HealthFirstCiscoWells FargoDeutsche BahnDeutsche TelekomWaterNSWUnumAflac
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, hosting
What Pega's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: pega.com, trust.pega.com, pega.com/platform-trial, pega.com/customers, pega.com/products/decision-hub/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pega's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pega, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Pega by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Pega is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Pega, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.