AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Blue Prism · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Blue Prism

66Judge labels
2First choices
37Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in RPA for enterprise buyers
Rank 68 of 68 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 50% of its 24 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Blue Prism →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In rpa · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Blue Prism for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Robotic process automationIT operations and endpoint0%68 of 6850%24criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Blue Prism yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Blue Prism across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500213
GPT-5.4 mini00011
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01012
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00112
Qwen 3.7 Flash00134
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX02013
MiniMax M2.501012
GPT-6 Luna00011
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained8 labels2
Scale-constrained12 labelsNone
Negative23 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative66 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need strong governance, audit trails and centralized control for regulated processes, solutions with IT-governed models such as SS&C Blue Prism are commonly chosen.” Muse Glimmer 30B · RPA · scale prompt · alternative
“Focus on platforms like UiPath, Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, or Blue Prism, which suit mid-market needs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · RPA · scale prompt · alternative
“Best for Regulated Industries ... Limitations: Steeper learning curve, more complex interface” GLM 4.7 FlashX · RPA · comparative prompt · alternative
“Industry: Blue Prism for highly regulated industries (BFSI, healthcare)” MiniMax M2.5 · RPA · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid Blue Prism and Kofax unless you have a specific, specialized need they solve.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · RPA · negative prompt · hard negative
“Its standard support has ended... Don't start a new deployment on v6” GPT-6 Luna · RPA · negative prompt · hard negative
“Blue Prism: It is considered expensive, with a price starting from $13,000 per digital "worker". It is also complex to deploy and maintain.” Llama 4 Maverick · RPA · negative prompt · soft negative
“Peer feedback on Blue Prism, for example, notes reliability but also slower adoption of new technology compared with other platforms.” GPT-5.4 mini · RPA · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Blue Prism, over the 66 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Blue Prism was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
UiPath63 of 6622Not among the top eight
Microsoft Power Automate59 of 6621Not among the top eight
Automation Anywhere59 of 664Not among the top eight
Pega12 of 660Not among the top eight
Zapier11 of 661Not among the top eight
Nintex8 of 660Not among the top eight
Make7 of 661Not among the top eight
WorkFusion5 of 660Not among the top eight
Zoho RPA5 of 660Not among the top eight
n8n5 of 660Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Blue Prism. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 58 of the 66 answers that named Blue Prism and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blueprism.comYour site24
2hatslogic.com23
kanerika.com23
layer3labs.io20
datamation.com19
g2.com19
resources.rework.com17
learn.g2.com13
linkedin.com13
eleks.com12

159 of the 183 domain citations in answers naming Blue Prism came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

blueprism.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Blue Prism takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Power Automate takes 51%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “rpa platform”
4
Position for “rpa platforms”
5
Searches for its name, Google
1,900 a month (“blue prism”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
245 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 22,901 a month
Searches its site ranks for
14,443 · 317 in the top three
Sites linking to it
6,974
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
28 ads · 24 text, 4 video · 19 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2025, as Blue Prism Limited, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 16 in the year, 12 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 68 of 68 in RPA
Segment leader
51%
Microsoft Power Automate
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
66 answers
Its own site cited
in 58 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on blueprism.com
4,372
subdomains included
Content
1,749
counted in the table below
Documentation
39
Product · Integration
108 · 8
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Case study52012026-09-03
Blog48152026-09-18
Report or ebook39342026-09-17
Podcast or video14252026-08-24
Webinar or virtual event95132026-11-12
News or press6012026-07-23
Conference or event2802021-01-22
Comparison2402026-05-07
Glossary or explainer402025-02-18
Template or tool222026-09-23
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page blueprism.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Blue Prism

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Blue Prism; a claim can dispute any of them.
Blue Prism (SS&C) 2Blue Prism (now SS&C Blue Prism) 2Blue Prism (by SS&C) 1Blue Prism Enterprise v6 1

Follow Blue Prism

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Blue Prism is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
agentic automation platform
For
the world’s top businesses
Price stated
Contact Us blueprism.com/plans-pricing
Free plan or trial
Free Trial blueprism.com
Customers named
BupaHapagOld MutualSelect HealthTelefonicaZurichSantanderAllianz
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Blue Prism's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: blueprism.com, blueprism.com/plans-pricing, blueprism.com/platform, blueprism.com/customers, blueprism.com/solutions/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Blue Prism's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Blue Prism, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Blue Prism by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Blue Prism is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Blue Prism, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at blueprism.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.