Index › IT operations and endpoint › Process mining › UiPath Process Mining vs Microsoft Power Automate
Process mining · October 2026 Edition
UiPath Process Mining vs Microsoft Power Automate
Two of fourteen models named UiPath Process Mining first on the direct prompt; two named Microsoft Power Automate. UiPath Process Mining was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Microsoft Power Automate by nine and UiPath Process Mining carries 50 labels and Microsoft Power Automate 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
First-choice share10%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate10%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels5014A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, UiPath Process Mining reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Apromore vs UiPath Process Mining · Apromore vs Microsoft Power Automate · Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs UiPath Process Mining
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the process mining page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
UiPath Process MiningFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMicrosoft Power Automate
Direct221 against UiPath Process Mining
Paraphrase30
Comparative00
Budget-constrained01
Scale-constrained10
Negative004 against UiPath Process Mining · 1 against Microsoft Power Automate
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, UiPath Process Mining and Microsoft Power Automate were named in the same answer forty-six times, of the 152 answers naming UiPath Process Mining and the 333 naming Microsoft Power Automate. In those answers Microsoft Power Automate took the first choice nine times and UiPath Process Mining one.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where UiPath Process Mining and Microsoft Power Automate stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
UiPath Process Mining Microsoft Power Automate first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, UiPath Process Mining on the left and Microsoft Power Automate on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where UiPath Process Mining and Microsoft Power Automate stood in it.
UiPath Process Mining first, Microsoft Power Automate not the choice
2 of 14 modelsMicrosoft Power Automate was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniUiPath Process Mining alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Mindzie, Minit, ProcessMind
Microsoft Power Automate first, UiPath Process Mining an alternative
2 of 14 modelsUiPath Process Mining was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Microsoft Power Automate alternatives: Apromore, ProcessMind, QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Grok 4.1 FastMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, KYP.ai, UiPath Process Mining
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Mistral SmallCelonis Process Intelligence Platform alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Qwen 3.7 FlashEverflow Process Intelligence, ProcessMaker alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
GLM 4.7 FlashXMindzie alternatives: ABBYY Timeline, Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate
MiniMax M2.5Apromore, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform alternatives: IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining
GPT-6 LunaApromore alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Llama 4 MaverickProcessMaker
Kimi K2Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Mindzie alternatives: Apromore, MEHRWERK, QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Muse Glimmer 30BDecisions, ProcessMaker alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Noxus
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Microsoft Power Automate leads by twenty-three points.
Microsoft Power Automate25%#1 of 12UiPath Process Mining2%#9 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: UiPath Process Mining leads at mid-market.
UiPath Process Mining10%#4 of 9Microsoft Power Automate5%#5 of 9Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
UiPath Process Mining0%#5 of 8Microsoft Power Automate0%#6 of 8What the models said about UiPath Process Mining
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“standalone mining feels limited. Enterprise pricing ($24K–$200K+ annually reported) and integration complexity for non-RPA users.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Verdict: Be cautious, particularly if you need robust data connectivity or accurate process analytics out of the box.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution: be cautious if you do not already use UiPath RPA, have messy/unstructured event logs and limited ETL capacity” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd usually recommend UiPath Process Intelligence if you want the best balance of discovery, automation follow-through, and scalability” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“UiPath Process Mining | Automation teams, RPA integration | $25/user/mo | 4.4/5” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“Best overall for many mid-market B2B firms: UiPath Process Mining” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Microsoft Power Automate
No label in this category carried a quote.
Also compared
Apromore vs UiPath Process MiningApromore vs Microsoft Power AutomateMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs UiPath Process MiningMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Microsoft Power AutomateIBM Process Mining vs UiPath Process MiningIBM Process Mining vs Microsoft Power AutomateUiPath Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceUiPath Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformUiPath Process Mining vs PM4PyMicrosoft Power Automate vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceMicrosoft Power Automate vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate vs PM4PyAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full process mining standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.