AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Microsoft Defender for Identity · October 2026 Edition
Microsoft · 1 category · Ranked

Microsoft Defender for Identity

117Judge labels
31First choices
12Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
38% in ITDR for enterprise buyers
Rank 2 of 105 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 38 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Microsoft Defender for Identity →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In itdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Microsoft Defender for Identity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Identity threat detection and responseIdentity and access14%2 of 1058%38accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft Defender for Identity yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft Defender for Identity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.513015
GPT-5.4 mini21104
Gemini 3.5 Flash13015
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast14005
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash02002
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash11002
Kimi K221003
GLM 4.7 FlashX03014
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna11002
Muse Glimmer 30B13004

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct18 labels6
Paraphrase27 labels10
Comparative19 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained24 labels12
Scale-constrained12 labels3
Negative17 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative117 labels in all, every segment counted; 31 of the 38 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Look to CrowdStrike Falcon Identity or Microsoft Defender for Identity. The integration of endpoint telemetry and identity logs provides a powerful, consolidated investigation workflow.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“Microsoft Defender for Identity is the natural choice for M365 E5 customers, providing no-additional-cost ITDR with native Defender XDR integration” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ITDR · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The "Zero Incremental Cost" Option: Microsoft Defender for Identity ... This is the highest ROI move you can make for a $0 incremental spend.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ITDR · budget prompt · first choice
“Microsoft 365 E5 already in place and want minimal add-on cost → start with Defender for Identity / Entra ID Protection.” Muse Glimmer 30B · ITDR · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Reviewers report heavy alert noise during onboarding that requires real tuning time and limited value outside Microsoft-centric environments, with rigid customization.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ITDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“is top-tier for Active Directory and Entra ID, but if your enterprise also uses Okta, Ping, or AWS IAM, Microsoft's native tools will leave major visibility gaps.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“Microsoft Defender for Identity users report that false positives on cloud-side detections require ongoing tuning effort and AD expertise” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ITDR · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Defender for Identity, over the 117 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Defender for Identity was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection52 of 1178Not among the top eight
Semperis Directory Services Protector24 of 1170Not among the top eight
SentinelOne Singularity Identity23 of 1170Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike19 of 1170Not among the top eight
SentinelOne16 of 1170Not among the top eight
Push Security15 of 1171Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Defender for Identity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 108 of the 117 answers that named Microsoft Defender for Identity and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

huntress.com75
gbhackers.com61
cybersecuritynews.com57
expertinsights.com55
cynet.com53
g2.com40
breachsense.com37
gartner.com35
startwithidentity.com35
cyberpress.org31

479 of the 479 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Defender for Identity came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Microsoft Defender for Identity stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
590 a month (“microsoft defender for identity”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
36 a month
Its own site
It sits on Microsoft's site (microsoft.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
14%
rank 2 of 105 in ITDR
Segment leader
51%
Huntress Managed ITDR
First choices
31 across its categories
Named in
117 answers
Its own site cited
in 108 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Microsoft Defender for Identity

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Microsoft Defender for Identity; a claim can dispute any of them.
Microsoft Defender for Identity (MDI) 3Microsoft Defender for Identity (Microsoft ITDR) 1Microsoft Defender for Identity (Standalone) 1

Follow Microsoft Defender for Identity

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Microsoft is the company behind Microsoft Defender for Identity.
ShowHide
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Defender for Identity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Defender for Identity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Defender for Identity by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Microsoft Defender for Identity is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Microsoft Defender for Identity, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at microsoft.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Microsoft Defender for Identity is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

Microsoft Defender for Identity is among the products AI models recommend first in Identity threat detection and response this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Identity threat detection and response, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/identity/identity-threat-detection-and-response/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/microsoft-defender-for-identity--identity-threat-detection-and-response-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Identity threat detection and response, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Identity threat detection and response standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Identity threat detection and response, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/identity/identity-threat-detection-and-response/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/microsoft-defender-for-identity--identity-threat-detection-and-response-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Identity threat detection and response, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Identity threat detection and response standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Identity threat detection and response, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/identity/identity-threat-detection-and-response/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/microsoft-defender-for-identity--identity-threat-detection-and-response-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Identity threat detection and response, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Identity threat detection and response standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.