Zero of fourteen models named Microsoft Defender for Identity first on the direct prompt; two named Sophos ITDR. Microsoft Defender for Identity was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Sophos ITDR by ten and Microsoft Defender for Identity carries 38 labels and Sophos ITDR 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the identity threat detection and response page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Microsoft Defender for Identity and Sophos ITDR were named in the same answer twenty-seven times, of the 117 answers naming Microsoft Defender for Identity and the 36 naming Sophos ITDR. In those answers Sophos ITDR took the first choice one time and Microsoft Defender for Identity six.
| Model | DirectMD | ParaphraseMD | ComparativeMD | Budget-constrainedMD | Scale-constrainedMD | NegativeMD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | MD | MD | MD | MD | MD | |
| GPT-5.4 mini | MD | MD | MD | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | MD | MD | MD | MD | MD | |
| Perplexity Sonar | MD | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | MD | MD | MD | MD | MD | |
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | MD | MD | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | MD | MD | ||||
| Kimi K2 | MD | MD | MD | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | MD | MD | MD | MD | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | MD | MD | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | MD | MD | MD | MD |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Reviewers report heavy alert noise during onboarding that requires real tuning time and limited value outside Microsoft-centric environments, with rigid customization.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“is top-tier for Active Directory and Entra ID, but if your enterprise also uses Okta, Ping, or AWS IAM, Microsoft's native tools will leave major visibility gaps.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Microsoft Defender for Identity users report that false positives on cloud-side detections require ongoing tuning effort and AD expertise” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Look to CrowdStrike Falcon Identity or Microsoft Defender for Identity. The integration of endpoint telemetry and identity logs provides a powerful, consolidated investigation workflow.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Microsoft Defender for Identity is the natural choice for M365 E5 customers, providing no-additional-cost ITDR with native Defender XDR integration” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The "Zero Incremental Cost" Option: Microsoft Defender for Identity ... This is the highest ROI move you can make for a $0 incremental spend.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Sophos ITDR: Offers a comprehensive ITDR solution with features such as threat detection, response, and protection.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“Need managed detection/response without building a SOC → Sophos ITDR or Huntress Managed ITDR.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Sophos ITDR or Cynet: These vendors integrate ITDR capabilities directly into their broader security packages.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.