AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › SentinelOne Singularity Identity · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

SentinelOne Singularity Identity

45Judge labels
0First choices
11Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in ITDR for mid-market buyers
Rank 20 of 105 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 17% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of SentinelOne Singularity Identity →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In itdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SentinelOne Singularity Identity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Identity threat detection and responseIdentity and access0%20 of 10517%12accepted challenger
Deception technologySecurity operations0%40 of 940%2under 10 labels · led by Thinkst Canary at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SentinelOne Singularity Identity yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SentinelOne Singularity Identity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500112
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K202013
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative17 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative45 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Top Recommendation: CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Threat Protection OR SentinelOne Singularity Identity” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITDR · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Choose SentinelOne if you want deception-based detection layered into identity security.” Perplexity Sonar · ITDR · comparative prompt · alternative
“If you are a SentinelOne shop, their Singularity Identity module is an excellent add-on.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITDR · direct prompt · alternative
“SentinelOne Singularity Identity (formerly Attivo) — but watch for complexity” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Deception · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to Avoid - ... SentinelOne Singularity Identity — excellent but typically require negotiation and higher minimums” Kimi K2 · ITDR · budget prompt · hard negative
“their platform is tech-heavy. You'll likely need a team of seasoned security pros” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ITDR · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SentinelOne Singularity Identity, over the 45 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SentinelOne Singularity Identity was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection34 of 457Not among the top eight
Microsoft Defender for Identity23 of 456Not among the top eight
Silverfort ITDR21 of 453Not among the top eight
Huntress Managed ITDR16 of 4510Not among the top eight
Okta Identity Threat Protection14 of 450Not among the top eight
Semperis Directory Services Protector11 of 450Not among the top eight
Cynet7 of 451Not among the top eight
BeyondTrust5 of 451Not among the top eight
Push Security5 of 451Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SentinelOne Singularity Identity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 42 of the 45 answers that named SentinelOne Singularity Identity and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com29
huntress.com27
cybersecuritynews.com26
cynet.com24
gartner.com21
gbhackers.com20
g2.com18
crowdstrike.com16
guardz.com14
microsoft.com14

209 of the 209 domain citations in answers naming SentinelOne Singularity Identity came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

sentinelone.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SentinelOne Singularity Identity takes 0% of first choices and Huntress Managed ITDR takes 51%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “itdr solution”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “itdr solutions”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
10 a month (“sentinelone singularity identity”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 446,702 a month
Searches its site ranks for
36,548 · 3,580 in the top three
Sites linking to it
19,511
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 20 clicks and $780 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
38 ads · 34 text, 2 image, 2 video · 22 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2024, as SENTINELONE, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 15 in the year, 23 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 20 of 105 in ITDR
Segment leader
51%
Huntress Managed ITDR
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
45 answers
Its own site cited
in 42 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on sentinelone.com
10,071
subdomains included
Content
2,891
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
71 · 13
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,583undatedXDR, EDR
News or press44082026-09-24Endpoint protection, XDR
Webinar or virtual event224undatedXDR, SIEM
Report or ebook224undatedXDR, Endpoint protection
Glossary or explainer189undatedCSPM, CNAPP
Comparison132undatedSIEM, EDR
Case study38undatedEDR
Template or tool24undatedSIEM
Conference or event2002026-04-20XDR
Podcast or video17undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page sentinelone.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name XDR (82); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as SentinelOne Singularity Identity

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SentinelOne Singularity Identity; a claim can dispute any of them.
SentinelOne Identity 1

Follow SentinelOne Singularity Identity

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SentinelOne Singularity Identity is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Identity Security Platform
Customers named
Barry-WehmillerAston Martin Lagonda LTDSundt Construction
Not stated on the pages read
Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What SentinelOne Singularity Identity's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: sentinelone.com/platform/identity, university.sentinelone.com/courses/singularity-identity, sentinelone.com/cybersecurity-101/identity-security, university.sentinelone.com/courses/identity-security-whiteboard, university.sentinelone.com/courses/accessing-the-identity-console. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SentinelOne Singularity Identity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SentinelOne Singularity Identity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SentinelOne Singularity Identity by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where SentinelOne Singularity Identity is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name SentinelOne Singularity Identity, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sentinelone.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.