AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection

86Judge labels
12First choices
19Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
23% in ITDR for enterprise buyers
Rank 16 of 105 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 19% of its 27 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In itdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Identity threat detection and responseIdentity and access0%16 of 10519%27accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510012
GPT-5.4 mini04004
Gemini 3.5 Flash13004
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast10124
Mistral Small02103
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201012
GLM 4.7 FlashX01012
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct19 labels5
Paraphrase18 labels6
Comparative24 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labels1
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative86 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you are already heavily invested in a top-tier endpoint agent: Look to CrowdStrike Falcon Identity or Microsoft Defender for Identity.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best overall for real-time identity defense fused with the Falcon platform” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ITDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“Hybrid/enterprise: CrowdStrike or Microsoft.” Grok 4.1 Fast · ITDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you need more advanced detection or have a complex hybrid environment, layer in CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection.” MiniMax M2.5 · ITDR · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to Avoid - Enterprise solutions like CrowdStrike Falcon Identity ... typically require negotiation and higher minimums” Kimi K2 · ITDR · budget prompt · hard negative
“Limitations emerge for organizations using diverse endpoint protection solutions.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ITDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“CrowdStrike: UI complexity, custom query language, tough migrations (G2 cons).” Grok 4.1 Fast · ITDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cons: High pricing, requires dedicated security team to fully utilize” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ITDR · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection, over the 86 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Microsoft Defender for Identity52 of 8615Not among the top eight
Huntress Managed ITDR43 of 8626Not among the top eight
Silverfort ITDR41 of 864Not among the top eight
SentinelOne Singularity Identity34 of 860Not among the top eight
Semperis Directory Services Protector29 of 861Not among the top eight
Okta Identity Threat Protection27 of 861Not among the top eight
Cynet11 of 860Not among the top eight
CyberArk Identity Security Platform10 of 860Not among the top eight
Sophos ITDR10 of 860Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 83 of the 86 answers that named CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

huntress.com60
expertinsights.com50
cybersecuritynews.com46
cynet.com41
gartner.com36
crowdstrike.comYour site35
gbhackers.com34
startwithidentity.com31
g2.com30
microsoft.com30

358 of the 393 domain citations in answers naming CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

crowdstrike.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection takes 0% of first choices and Huntress Managed ITDR takes 51%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “itdr solution”
4
Position for “itdr solutions”
3
Searches for its name, Google
320 a month (“crowdstrike falcon identity protection”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
6 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 715,209 a month
Searches its site ranks for
43,445 · 4,686 in the top three
Sites linking to it
36,699
Paid Google search
29 searches its ads show for, about 239 clicks and $13,967 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
119+ ads · 87 text, 20 image, 12 video · 119 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2024, as CROWDSTRIKE, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 90 in the year, 29 before. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 16 of 105 in ITDR
Segment leader
51%
Huntress Managed ITDR
First choices
12 across its categories
Named in
86 answers
Its own site cited
in 83 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on crowdstrike.com
14,523
subdomains included
Content
6,477
counted in the table below
Documentation
27
Product · Integration
649 · 76
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog3,995undated
Report or ebook750162026-09-21
News or press713282026-09-24
Case study479162026-09-24
Podcast or video23102026-03-24
Comparison169undated
Conference or event10302026-05-07
Webinar or virtual event20undated
Glossary or explainer10undated
Template or tool702026-03-05

Most recent

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on crowdstrike.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page crowdstrike.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection; a claim can dispute any of them.
CrowdStrike Falcon Identity 4CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Threat Protection 2CrowdStrike Identity Protection 1

Follow CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-driven identity protection
Free plan or trial
Start free trial crowdstrike.com/platform/identity-protection
Customers named
Cushman & Wakefield
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: crowdstrike.com/platform/identity-protection, crowdstrike.com/es-es/cybersecurity-101/identity-protection, crowdstrike.com/tech-hub/identity-protection/falcon-privileged-access, crowdstrike.com/tech-hub/identity-protection/securing-non-human-identities, crowdstrike.com/tech-hub/identity-protection/threat-hunting-with-falcon-identity-protection. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at crowdstrike.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.