Every category where a model named SentinelOne for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Identity threat detection and response	Identity and access	0%	95 of 105	33%	9	under 10 labels · led by Huntress Managed ITDR at 51%
Vulnerability management platforms	Security operations	0%	24 of 77	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 30%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
SIEM platforms	Security operations	0%	52 of 61	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Sentinel at 38%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Data loss prevention	Security operations	0%	48 of 89	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview DLP at 46%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Email security	Security operations	0%	33 of 76	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Office 365 at 32%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Enterprise browsers	Security operations	0%	68 of 80	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Google Password Manager at 26%
Network access control	Network and edge	0%	61 of 111	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Portnox Cloud at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SentinelOne yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SentinelOne across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.20	0	4	2	6
Mistral Small	0	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	4	1	1	6
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labelsNone

Scale-constrained12 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Solutions like Zscaler, SentinelOne, or CrowdStrike that move access control away from the network layer” Qwen 3.7 Flash · NAC · negative prompt · alternative

“XDR/EDR Extensions: CrowdStrike, SentinelOne (if you are already heavily invested in one of these ecosystems).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ITDR · scale prompt · alternative

“Look at Microsoft Purview (native) or Netskope/SentinelOne (add-ons).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DLP · scale prompt · alternative

“though they may lack advanced network scanning capabilities” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Vuln management · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid enterprise-heavy tools like CrowdStrike ... or SentinelOne unless you have existing stacks.” Grok 4.20 · ITDR · budget prompt · hard negative

“Many enterprise-tier ITDR solutions (like Silverfort, CrowdStrike, and SentinelOne) require minimum seat counts, custom quoting, and—most importantly—significant engineering resources to manage.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITDR · budget prompt · soft negative

“fitting budgets better than enterprise options (CrowdStrike/SentinelOne at $10+/user/mo)” Grok 4.20 · ITDR · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“Higher complexity; usually best if you are buying a larger security stack.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Enterprise browsers · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SentinelOne, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SentinelOne was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CrowdStrike22 of 441Not among the top eight

Microsoft Defender for Identity16 of 446Not among the top eight

Huntress Managed ITDR14 of 448Not among the top eight

Silverfort ITDR14 of 442Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection7 of 442Not among the top eight

Cynet7 of 441Not among the top eight

Sophos ITDR7 of 440Not among the top eight

Microsoft Sentinel6 of 440Not among the top eight

Semperis Directory Services Protector6 of 440Not among the top eight

Microsoft Entra ID5 of 441Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SentinelOne. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 44 answers that named SentinelOne and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com18

cybersecuritynews.com15

huntress.com14

cynet.com12

gbhackers.com12

breachsense.com11

startupstash.com10

paloaltonetworks.com8

startwithidentity.com8

gartner.com7

115 of the 115 domain citations in answers naming SentinelOne came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cybersecuritynews.com/best-identity-threat-detection-and-response-solutions14

huntress.com/itdr-guide/best-itdr-vendors13

cynet.com/security-foundations/identity-security/itdr-vendors12

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/the-top-identity-threat-detection-and-re12

breachsense.com/blog/itdr-tools11

gbhackers.com/itdr-solutions-compared-features-pricing10

startupstash.com/top-identity-threat-detection-and-response-platforms8

daylight.ai/blog/best-itdr-tools6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

sentinelone.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SentinelOne takes 0% of first choices and Huntress Managed ITDR takes 51%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “itdr solution”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “itdr solutions”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 33,100 a month (“sentinelone”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1,675 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 446,702 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 36,548 · 3,580 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 19,511
Paid Google search: 2 searches its ads show for, about 20 clicks and $780 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

38 ads · 34 text, 2 image, 2 video · 22 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2024, as SENTINELONE, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 15 in the year, 23 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 95 of 105 in ITDR

Segment leader

51%

Huntress Managed ITDR

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 44 answers
Its own site cited: in 33 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on sentinelone.com

10,071

subdomains included

Content

2,891

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

71 · 13

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	1,583	undated		XDR, EDR
News or press	440	8	2026-09-24	Endpoint protection, XDR
Webinar or virtual event	224	undated		XDR, SIEM
Report or ebook	224	undated		XDR, Endpoint protection
Glossary or explainer	189	undated		CSPM, CNAPP
Comparison	132	undated		SIEM, EDR
Case study	38	undated		EDR
Template or tool	24	undated		SIEM
Conference or event	20	0	2026-04-20	XDR
Podcast or video	17	undated

Most recent

2026-09-24Sentinelone extends wayfinder threat huntings continuous coverage to aws azure and google cloud news or press
2026-09-17New study from sentinelone sp globals 451 research uncovers widely divergent enterprise readiness for autonomous soc ado news or press
2026-09-15Sentinelone named an ai security platform leader in latio 2026 ai security market report news or press
2026-09-03Sentinelone expands wayfinder frontier ai services with openai daybreak models news or press
2026-08-26Sentinelone and tenable find cyber attackers routinely target edge device vendor ecosystems rather than individual vulne news or press
2026-08-20Professor james mickens katie moussouris christiaan triebert and dino dai zovi to keynote sentinelones labscon 2026 news or press

Events in person

Last twelve months

April 20, 20262026 EMEA PartnerOne SummitCascais, Portugal · took part

As the event pages on sentinelone.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page sentinelone.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name XDR (82); 40 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as SentinelOne

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SentinelOne; a claim can dispute any of them.

SentinelOne/Cynet 1

Follow SentinelOne

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SentinelOne is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI-Powered Enterprise Cybersecurity Platform
sentinelone.com
For: Enterprise
sentinelone.com
Price stated: Pricing & Packages sentinelone.com/customers
Free plan or trial: Free Platform Demo sentinelone.com
Certifications: FedRAMP High AuthorizedACNCCPACommon CriteriaCyber EssentialsCyber Essentials PlusFedRAMP HighFISMA High
Hosting: AWS Regions Worldwide
Customers named: Golden State WarriorsNorwegian AirlinesAston Martin Lagonda LTDAston Martin Aramco Formula OneBarry-WehmillerMBCICarnival CorporationYahoo
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations

What SentinelOne's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sentinelone.com, trust.sentinelone.com, sentinelone.com/platform, sentinelone.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SentinelOne's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SentinelOne, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SentinelOne by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where SentinelOne is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name SentinelOne, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.