Every category where a model named Push Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Identity threat detection and response	Identity and access	0%	29 of 105	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Huntress Managed ITDR at 51%
Enterprise browsers	Security operations	0%	24 of 80	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Google Password Manager at 26%
SaaS security posture management	Security operations	0%	77 of 95	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Wing Security at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Push Security yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Push Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative7 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Highly affordable way to monitor browser extensions, SaaS logins, and restrict dangerous data-sharing.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Enterprise browsers · budget prompt · alternative

“Best "Free Tier" for SaaS-Heavy Companies: Push Security ... a highly innovative choice” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITDR · budget prompt · alternative

“the lowest-cost option in the results appears to be Push Security at $5/user/month” Perplexity Sonar · Enterprise browsers · budget prompt · alternative

“Best for: Companies wanting to secure existing browsers without migration” MiniMax M2.5 · Enterprise browsers · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“but that is more of a starter option than a full budget ITDR program” Perplexity Sonar · ITDR · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Push Security, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Push Security was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Huntress Managed ITDR23 of 3721Not among the top eight

Microsoft Defender for Identity15 of 370Not among the top eight

Silverfort ITDR9 of 370Not among the top eight

Google Password Manager7 of 374Not among the top eight

Island Enterprise Browser7 of 371Not among the top eight

Sophos ITDR6 of 370Not among the top eight

Microsoft Edge for Business5 of 372Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection5 of 370Not among the top eight

SentinelOne Singularity Identity5 of 370Not among the top eight

LayerX4 of 370Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Push Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 37 of the 37 answers that named Push Security and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gbhackers.com30

cyberpress.org20

cybersecuritynews.com20

expertinsights.com20

g2.com20

huntress.com18

us.fitgap.com14

cynet.com12

startupstash.com11

itechguides.com9

174 of the 174 domain citations in answers naming Push Security came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gbhackers.com/itdr-solutions-compared-features-pricing23

huntress.com/itdr-guide/best-itdr-vendors17

cyberpress.org/itdr-solutions-by-business-size13

g2.com/categories/identity-threat-detection-and-response-itdr/small-business13

cybersecuritynews.com/best-identity-threat-detection-and-response-solutions12

cynet.com/security-foundations/identity-security/itdr-vendors12

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/the-top-identity-threat-detection-and-re12

breachsense.com/blog/itdr-tools7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

pushsecurity.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Push Security takes 0% of first choices and Huntress Managed ITDR takes 51%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “itdr solution”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “itdr solutions”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,000 a month (“push security”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 83 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 5,368 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,212 · 31 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,827
Paid Google search: 1 searches its ads show for, about 1 clicks and $51 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

21 ads · 21 text · 4 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2025, as Push Security Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 20 in the year, 1 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 29 of 105 in ITDR

Segment leader

51%

Huntress Managed ITDR

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 37 answers
Its own site cited: in 37 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on pushsecurity.com

643

subdomains included

Content

378

counted in the table below

Documentation

142

Product · Integration

24 · 3

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	303	10	2026-09-29	MFA, Enterprise browsers
Webinar or virtual event	21	undated
News or press	21	1	2026-09-29	Enterprise browsers
Glossary or explainer	10	0	2024-01-03	MFA
Case study	8	2	2026-07-31
Conference or event	7	undated
Comparison	4	0	2026-05-21
Podcast or video	3	undated
Report or ebook	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-29Product release september 2026 blog
2026-09-29Proofpoint x push partnership announcement blog
2026-09-29Push partners with proofpoint news or press
2026-09-23The state of clickfix by detection data blog
2026-09-156 browser based attacks every security team should be prepared for blog
2026-08-24Authorization phishing blog

Events in person

Upcoming

October 6, 2026SecTorToronto, Canada · exhibits

As the event pages on pushsecurity.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page pushsecurity.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name MFA (11); 2 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Push Security

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Push Security is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Enterprise browser security without replacing your browser. Stop attacks, secure AI usage & harden your identity attack surface. Built for the AI era.
pushsecurity.com
For: Enterprise security teams
pushsecurity.com
Price stated: Yes. Push costs $6 per employee/month when billed monthly and $5 per employee/month on an annual contract. pushsecurity.com/pricing
Starting price: 5 pushsecurity.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Start a trial pushsecurity.com/pricing
Certifications: SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 27701GDPR complianceCyber EssentialsGDPRISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27701
Hosting: EU (Dublin, with backup in Paris)eu-west-1 (Dublin, Ireland)eu-west-3 (Paris, France)europe-west1 (Belgium)
Customers named: SophosGitlabCriblgreynoiseRampupvestThinkstHubSpot
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations

What Push Security's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: pushsecurity.com, pushsecurity.com/pricing, trust.pushsecurity.com, pushsecurity.com/solution/achieve-security-outcomes/secure-ai, pushsecurity.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Push Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Push Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Push Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Push Security is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Push Security, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.