Every category where a model named Silverfort ITDR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Identity threat detection and response	Identity and access	4%	3 of 105	4%	23	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Silverfort ITDR yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Silverfort ITDR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	4	0	1	6
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	2	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	2	0	0	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	3	0	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct15 labels1

Paraphrase10 labels1

Comparative23 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained10 labels2

Scale-constrained8 labels1

Negative12 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative78 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd suggest starting with Huntress or Silverfort as they balance strong protection with manageability” MiniMax M2.5 · ITDR · direct prompt · first choice

“prioritize vendor-agnostic ITDR solutions (like Silverfort, CrowdStrike Falcon Identity, or Semperis)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITDR · negative prompt · first choice

“Dedicated Identity Leaders: Silverfort, Centraleyes (formerly BeyondTrust).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ITDR · scale prompt · first choice

“look for a tool (like Silverfort or Semperis) that can apply modern protection (like MFA) to legacy protocols” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITDR · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Many enterprise-tier ITDR solutions (like Silverfort, CrowdStrike, and SentinelOne) require minimum seat counts, custom quoting, and—most importantly—significant engineering resources to manage.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITDR · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Silverfort ITDR, over the 78 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Silverfort ITDR was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Defender for Identity52 of 7816Compare →

Huntress Managed ITDR47 of 7831Compare →

CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection41 of 7811Not among the top eight

Semperis Directory Services Protector26 of 781Not among the top eight

Okta Identity Threat Protection26 of 780Compare →

SentinelOne Singularity Identity21 of 780Not among the top eight

Sophos ITDR21 of 780Compare →

CrowdStrike18 of 782Not among the top eight

Cynet14 of 780Not among the top eight

SentinelOne14 of 780Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Silverfort ITDR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 77 of the 78 answers that named Silverfort ITDR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

huntress.com56

cybersecuritynews.com45

gbhackers.com42

cynet.com41

expertinsights.com41

gartner.com29

guardz.com28

startwithidentity.com28

daylight.ai27

breachsense.com26

363 of the 363 domain citations in answers naming Silverfort ITDR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

huntress.com/itdr-guide/best-itdr-vendors50

cynet.com/security-foundations/identity-security/itdr-vendors41

gbhackers.com/itdr-solutions-compared-features-pricing41

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/the-top-identity-threat-detection-and-re40

cybersecuritynews.com/best-identity-threat-detection-and-response-solutions39

breachsense.com/blog/itdr-tools26

daylight.ai/blog/best-itdr-tools26

gartner.com/reviews/market/identity-threat-detection-and-response-itdr25

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

silverfort.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Silverfort ITDR takes 4% of first choices and Huntress Managed ITDR takes 51%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “itdr solution”

Position for “itdr solutions”

Searches for its name, Google: 10 a month (“silverfort itdr”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 15,992 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,628 · 169 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,672
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 71 text, 37 image, 12 video · 49 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2023, as Silverfort LTD, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 65 in the year, 55 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 3 of 105 in ITDR

Segment leader

51%

Huntress Managed ITDR

First choices: 5 across its categories
Named in: 78 answers
Its own site cited: in 77 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on silverfort.com

909

subdomains included

Content

767

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

76 · 1

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	532	43	2026-09-25	MFA, PAM
News or press	100	0	2026-06-08	MFA, PAM
Glossary or explainer	68	1	2026-08-05	MFA, IGA
Case study	19	1	2026-07-24	MFA
Report or ebook	18	0	2026-01-24	MFA
Webinar or virtual event	14	0	2026-06-01
Template or tool	5	1	2026-07-30	MFA
Conference or event	4	0	2026-04-02
Comparison	4	2	2026-07-28	MFA, PAM
Podcast or video	3	0	2026-05-20

Most recent

2026-09-25Silverfort integration with anthropic compliance api blog
2026-09-24Replicating part of the openai attack on hugging face blog
2026-09-21Runtime is where ai agent security gets real new research unpacks the arise framework blog
2026-09-16Silverfort and sentinelone risk based policy escalation blog
2026-09-11Papercut breach what ai agent attacks teach us about identity security resilience blog
2026-09-10Ai agent intent explained blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page silverfort.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name MFA (65); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Silverfort ITDR

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Silverfort ITDR; a claim can dispute any of them.

Silverfort 21

Follow Silverfort ITDR

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Silverfort ITDR is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Detect and respond. Anytime, anywhere.
silverfort.com
For: enterprise deals
trust.silverfort.com
Price stated: Contact us for a quote. silverfort.com/pricing
Certifications: CCPACPRAEU-US DPFGDPRISO/IEC 27001:2022Microsoft SSPANIST CSFSOC 2
Hosting: On-PremCloudHybridEast-USWest-USGermany-WestFrance-CentralWest Europe (Netherlands)
Customers named: KayakWomble Bond DickinsonAgilisysAgodaPayoneerUPSSingtelAirbus
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations

What Silverfort ITDR's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: silverfort.com, silverfort.com/pricing, trust.silverfort.com, silverfort.com/platform, silverfort.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Silverfort ITDR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Silverfort ITDR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Silverfort ITDR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Silverfort ITDR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Silverfort ITDR, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Silverfort ITDR is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

Silverfort ITDR is among the products AI models recommend first in Identity threat detection and response this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/identity/identity-threat-detection-and-response/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/silverfort-itdr--identity-threat-detection-and-response-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Identity threat detection and response, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Identity threat detection and response standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/identity/identity-threat-detection-and-response/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/silverfort-itdr--identity-threat-detection-and-response-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Identity threat detection and response, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Identity threat detection and response standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/identity/identity-threat-detection-and-response/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/silverfort-itdr--identity-threat-detection-and-response-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Identity threat detection and response, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Identity threat detection and response standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.