| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application performance monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 2% | 7 of 70 | 11% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 54% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd suggest starting with ManageEngine Applications Manager or SolarWinds because they're specifically designed for mid-market needs” MiniMax M2.5 · APM · direct prompt · first choice
“Provides application performance and IT infrastructure monitoring, with a focus on holistic monitoring, ease of deployment, and scalability.” Llama 4 Maverick · APM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“For a more budget-friendly, all-in-one solution, ManageEngine Applications Manager is worth considering.” Mistral Small · APM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Good value if you want on-prem and lower cost; less full-featured than New Relic.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · APM · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Be Cautious With: ManageEngine Applications Manager if your team values a modern UI and ease of use” GLM 4.7 FlashX · APM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named ManageEngine Applications Manager and are not a share of its labels.
Sixty-one of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming ManageEngine Applications Manager came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ManageEngine Applications Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ManageEngine Applications Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at manageengine.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.