IT AI Index
Index Vendors › ManageEngine Applications Manager · September 2026 Edition
ManageEngine · 1 category · Named, not ranked

ManageEngine Applications Manager

13Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ManageEngine Applications Manager was named 9 times in APM, where New Relic led with 54%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In apm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ManageEngine Applications Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Application performance monitoringIT operations and endpoint2%7 of 7011%9under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 54%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ManageEngine Applications Manager yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ManageEngine Applications Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K202002
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.510001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd suggest starting with ManageEngine Applications Manager or SolarWinds because they're specifically designed for mid-market needs” MiniMax M2.5 · APM · direct prompt · first choice
“Provides application performance and IT infrastructure monitoring, with a focus on holistic monitoring, ease of deployment, and scalability.” Llama 4 Maverick · APM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“For a more budget-friendly, all-in-one solution, ManageEngine Applications Manager is worth considering.” Mistral Small · APM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Good value if you want on-prem and lower cost; less full-featured than New Relic.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · APM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Be Cautious With: ManageEngine Applications Manager if your team values a modern UI and ease of use” GLM 4.7 FlashX · APM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ManageEngine Applications Manager, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ManageEngine Applications Manager was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
New Relic12 of 137Not in the top three
Datadog12 of 132Not in the top three
Dynatrace7 of 133Not in the top three
IBM Instana7 of 130Not in the top three
Site24x74 of 131Not in the top three
AppDynamics4 of 130Not in the top three
Grafana Cloud3 of 130Not in the top three
SolarWinds AppOptics2 of 131Not in the top three
Azure Monitor Application Insights2 of 130Not in the top three
Elastic Observability2 of 130Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ManageEngine Applications Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named ManageEngine Applications Manager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com12
manageengine.comYour site11
learn.g2.com8
newrelic.com8
reveillesoftware.com8
motadata.com6
rollbar.com6
uptrace.dev5
betterstack.com4
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com4

Sixty-one of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming ManageEngine Applications Manager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ManageEngine Applications Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ManageEngine Applications Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at manageengine.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack