IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Linx · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Linx

4Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Linx was named 3 times in IGA, where Lumos led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business38 of 81

under the label threshold

Mid-market18 of 77

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In iga · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Linx for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Identity governance	Identity and access	2%	18 of 77	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Lumos at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Linx yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Linx across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 label1

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“modern, SaaS-first options like Lumos, Zluri, Linx, Opal Security, and Iden” DeepSeek V4 Flash · IGA · scale prompt · first choice

“Choose Opal, Lumos, or Linx if you are a fast-moving, cloud-native tech company” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Linx, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Linx was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Lumos4 of 41Not in the top three

Opal Security4 of 40Not in the top three

Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud3 of 40Not in the top three

Zluri3 of 40Not in the top three

SailPoint2 of 41Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra ID Governance2 of 40Not in the top three

Torii1 of 41Not in the top three

Corma1 of 40Not in the top three

Iden1 of 40Not in the top three

Okta Identity Governance1 of 40Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Linx. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 4 answers that named Linx and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

corma.io3

linx.securityYour site3

securends.com2

accessowl.com1

blog.gitguardian.com1

c1.ai1

credentialgovernance.avatier.com1

docs.evolveum.com1

expertinsights.com1

gartner.com1

Twelve of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Linx came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

corma.io/blog/best-iga-solutions-for-mid-market-companies3

linx.security/blog/top-10-iga-tools-a-modern-identity-governance-buyers-guide3

accessowl.com/blog/buyers-guide-for-iga-tools-by-team-size1

blog.gitguardian.com/top-identity-orchestration-tools1

c1.ai/guides/best-identity-lifecycle-management-solutions1

credentialgovernance.avatier.com/en/blog/best-identity-governance-administration-solutions1

docs.evolveum.com/iam/iga/capabilities1

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/top-identity-governance-and-administrati1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Linx's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Linx, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at linx.security is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.