Every category where a model named Keeper Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Business password managers	Identity and access	0%	6 of 35	4%	45	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Keeper Security yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Keeper Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	3	0	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	3	0	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	4	0	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	1	2	1	0	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	3	1	1	5
Mistral Small	0	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	4	0	1	6
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	1	0	3
Kimi K2	0	4	0	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	4	0	0	4
MiniMax M2.5	0	5	0	0	5

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct27 labels5

Paraphrase27 labels3

Comparative34 labels8not counted in share

Budget-constrained20 labels1

Scale-constrained22 labels1

Negative18 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative148 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 20 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Keeper leads on regulatory/compliance depth: FedRAMP authorization” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Password managers · comparative prompt · first choice

“Best overall: 1Password or Keeper” Perplexity Sonar · Password managers · comparative prompt · first choice

“already heavily invested in Microsoft 365 and has mature MFA, Keeper Business could save you a bit more on seat price” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Password managers · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Top recommended alternatives include 1Password, Dashlane, Bitwarden (paid plans), and Keeper.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Password managers · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Cheaper options like Zoho Vault ($1/user Standard) or Keeper Starter lack some polish/audits” Grok 4.1 Fast · Password managers · budget prompt · soft negative

“Heavier; more than a pure password manager” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Password managers · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Keeper Security, over the 148 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Keeper Security was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Bitwarden145 of 14850Not in the top three

1Password142 of 14859Not in the top three

Dashlane87 of 1481Not in the top three

NordPass77 of 1482Not in the top three

LastPass57 of 1480Not in the top three

RoboForm31 of 1482Not in the top three

Proton Pass24 of 1481Not in the top three

Zoho Vault16 of 1480Not in the top three

ManageEngine Password Manager Pro11 of 1480Not in the top three

Google Password Manager8 of 1480Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Keeper Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 119 of the 148 answers that named Keeper Security and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

petronellatech.com72

pcmag.com71

techrepublic.com64

bitwarden.com61

security.org55

passwordmanager.com40

pwdfortress.com40

techbullion.com34

1password.com31

allaboutcookies.org29

497 of the 497 domain citations in answers naming Keeper Security came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

petronellatech.com/blog/best-password-managers-for-business-2026-comparison-guide72

pcmag.com/picks/the-best-password-managers-for-businesses70

techrepublic.com/article/enterprise-password-managers54

security.org/password-manager/best/business53

pwdfortress.com/en/blog/best-password-manager-for-business36

techbullion.com/best-password-manager-business34

allaboutcookies.org/best-password-managers-for-businesses29

bitwarden.com/resources/business-password-manager-comparison-report27

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Keeper Security

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Keeper Security; a claim can dispute any of them.

Keeper 24Keeper Business 12Keeper (Enterprise) 1Keeper Business & Enterprise 1Keeper Business / Enterprise 1Keeper Business Starter 1Keeper Business/Enterprise 1Keeper Enterprise 1Keeper Security Enterprise 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Keeper Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Keeper Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at keepersecurity.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.