Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 28 of 41, unchanged
Keeper · 1 category · Named, not rankedKeeper Secrets Manager
16Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Keeper Secrets Manager was named 4 times in Secrets, where HashiCorp Vault led with 31%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business26 of 43
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 59
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise21 of 53
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
In secrets · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Keeper Secrets Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secrets management | Identity and access | 0% | 18 of 59 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by HashiCorp Vault at 31% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Keeper Secrets Manager held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Secrets · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 35 → 17 of 54
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 24 of 53, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secrets | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 35 → 18 of 59 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Keeper Secrets Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Keeper Secrets Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative5 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“which specialize in easy setup, environmental syncing, and seamless developer workflows” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secrets · negative prompt · alternative
“Other options to consider are Keeper Secrets Manager and AWS Secrets Manager” Llama 4 Maverick · Secrets · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Keeper Secrets Manager, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Keeper Secrets Manager was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Keeper Secrets Manager, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Keeper Secrets Manager was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Keeper Secrets Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 16 answers that named Keeper Secrets Manager and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cybersecuritynews.com11
blog.railway.com8
doppler.com7
guideflow.com7
infisical.com7
blog.gitguardian.com6
cyberpress.org6
cycode.com6
startwithidentity.com6
dupple.com5
Sixty-nine of the sixty-nine domain citations in answers naming Keeper Secrets Manager came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
keepersecurity.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Keeper Secrets Manager takes 0% of first choices and HashiCorp Vault takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
keepersecurity.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Keeper Secrets Manager takes 0% of first choices and HashiCorp Vault takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “secrets management tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “secrets management tools”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 210 a month (“keeper secrets manager”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Its company's site
- keepersecurity.com shared with Keeper's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 126,627 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 15,517 · 450 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 13,218
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 117 clicks and $1,702 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 18 of 59 in secrets
Segment leader
31%
HashiCorp Vault
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 16 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow Keeper Secrets Manager
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Keeper is the company behind Keeper Secrets Manager.ShowHide
The company
Keeper is the company behind Keeper Secrets Manager.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Keeper
- Keeper Security
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Keeper Secrets Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Keeper Secrets Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Keeper Secrets Manager by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Keeper Secrets Manager is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Keeper Secrets Manager, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.