IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Keeper Secrets Manager · September 2026 Edition

Keeper · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Keeper Secrets Manager

3Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

2 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Keeper Secrets Manager was named 3 times in Secrets, where Doppler led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market37 of 40

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In secrets · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Keeper Secrets Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Secrets management	Identity and access	0%	37 of 40	67%	3	under 10 labels · led by Doppler at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Keeper Secrets Manager yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Keeper Secrets Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“their developer platforms lack the deep ecosystem integrations and sophisticated application config features” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secrets · direct prompt · soft negative

“Best for smaller development teams or simpler architectures.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secrets · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Keeper Secrets Manager, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Keeper Secrets Manager was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Doppler3 of 32Not in the top three

Infisical3 of 32Not in the top three

AWS Secrets Manager3 of 30Not in the top three

Azure Key Vault3 of 30Not in the top three

Google Secret Manager3 of 30Not in the top three

HashiCorp Vault3 of 30Not in the top three

1Password2 of 30Not in the top three

Akeyless2 of 30Not in the top three

OpenBao2 of 30Not in the top three

CyberArk Conjur1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Keeper Secrets Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 3 answers that named Keeper Secrets Manager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

akeyless.io1

atera.com1

blog.gitguardian.com1

blog.railway.com1

cycode.com1

dev.to1

doppler.com1

envmanager.com1

expertinsights.com1

gitnux.org1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Keeper Secrets Manager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

akeyless.io/blog/the-essential-guide-to-secrets-management1

atera.com/blog/best-secrets-management1

blog.gitguardian.com/top-secrets-management-tools1

blog.railway.com/p/best-secrets-management-20261

cycode.com/blog/best-secrets-management-tools1

dev.to/thedailyagent/top-6-secrets-management-tools-for-devs-in-2026-4ahe1

doppler.com/blog/secrets-management-tools-20251

envmanager.com/blog/best-secrets-management-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Keeper Secrets Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Keeper Secrets Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at keeper.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.