Every category where a model named RoboForm for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Business password managers	Identity and access	2%	4 of 35	12%	16	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for RoboForm yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated RoboForm across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative14 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained17 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative45 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“is NordPass Business or RoboForm Business, both of which are priced under $4 per user per month” Llama 4 Maverick · Password managers · budget prompt · first choice

“If you need SSO integration and automated user provisioning (SCIM) at the lowest possible cost, go with RoboForm.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Password managers · budget prompt · alternative

“one of the most affordable business password managers and easier to manage for small and mid-sized businesses” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Password managers · direct prompt · alternative

“RoboForm Business is often cheaper... recommended for small teams on a tight budget” Perplexity Sonar · Password managers · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Cautious Use Required ... RoboForm - Audit transparency concerns” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Password managers · negative prompt · soft negative

“Solid for small businesses, though the interface feels more dated” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Password managers · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as RoboForm, over the 45 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RoboForm was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Bitwarden43 of 4519Not in the top three

NordPass41 of 454Not in the top three

1Password35 of 4517Not in the top three

Keeper Security31 of 454Not in the top three

Proton Pass16 of 451Not in the top three

Dashlane16 of 450Not in the top three

LastPass13 of 450Not in the top three

Zoho Vault7 of 451Not in the top three

ManageEngine Password Manager Pro4 of 450Not in the top three

Built-in Browser Managers1 of 450Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RoboForm. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 42 of the 45 answers that named RoboForm and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

security.org41

pcmag.com35

passwordmanager.com23

petronellatech.com21

techrepublic.com18

ifeeltech.com17

topickz.com16

pwdfortress.com15

techbullion.com15

safetydetectives.com14

215 of the 215 domain citations in answers naming RoboForm came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

security.org/password-manager/best/business40

pcmag.com/picks/the-best-password-managers-for-businesses35

petronellatech.com/blog/best-password-managers-for-business-2026-comparison-guide21

passwordmanager.com/best-small-business-password-managers20

ifeeltech.com/blog/best-password-manager17

topickz.com/list/best-password-managers16

techbullion.com/best-password-manager-business15

pwdfortress.com/en/blog/best-password-manager-for-business14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as RoboForm

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as RoboForm; a claim can dispute any of them.

RoboForm Business 4RoboForm for Business 4

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RoboForm's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RoboForm, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at roboform.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.