AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Bitwarden · October 2026 Edition
4 categories · Ranked

Bitwarden

227Judge labels
65First choices
11Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
49% in Password managers for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 35 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
4 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 72 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Bitwarden →
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In password managers · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bitwarden for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Business password managersIdentity and access43%2 of 354%72endorsed leader▼−6Since September 2026: 49% → 43%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Client-side protectionSecurity operations0%42 of 1200%1under 10 labels · led by cside at 13%
IT documentationIT operations and endpoint0%44 of 920%1under 10 labels · led by Hudu at 17%
Privileged access managementIdentity and access0%26 of 730%1under 10 labels · led by Delinea Secret Server at 37%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Bitwarden held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Password managers · by segment

Small business▲+13Since September 2026: 38% → 51%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
51%from 38% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 2 pointsRank 2 → 1 of 35
Mid-market▼−6Since September 2026: 49% → 43%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
43%from 49% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 1 → 2 of 35
Enterprise▼−9Since September 2026: 43% → 33%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
33%from 43% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 2 pointsRank 1 → 2 of 37

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Password managers49%43%▼−6Since September 2026: 49% → 43%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 1 → 2 of 35
Client-side protection0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 42 of 120, unchanged
IT documentation0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 44 of 92, unchanged
PAM0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 49 → 26 of 73

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Bitwarden across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.522015
GPT-5.4 mini23005
Gemini 3.5 Flash26008
Perplexity Sonar12003
Grok 4.2033006
Mistral Small40105
DeepSeek V4 Flash14106
Llama 4 Maverick01203
Qwen 3.7 Flash23005
Kimi K233107
GLM 4.7 FlashX22116
MiniMax M2.532106
GPT-6 Luna13004
Muse Glimmer 30B32016

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct39 labels13
Paraphrase38 labels11
Comparative41 labels14not counted in share
Budget-constrained47 labels36
Scale-constrained30 labels5
Negative32 labels11not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative227 labels in all, every segment counted; 65 of the 90 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Most mid-market companies find success with either 1Password (if UX/adoption matters most) or Bitwarden (if cost and transparency are priorities).” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Password managers · direct prompt · first choice
“Bitwarden is the best overall choice for most teams because it is repeatedly identified as the budget pick” Perplexity Sonar · Password managers · budget prompt · first choice
“Fully open-source, highly transparent, very cost-effective, and supports self-hosting for enterprise environments.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Password managers · negative prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Bitwarden Enterprise because it offers: - The best balance of security, features, and price” Kimi K2 · Password managers · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid (or at minimum, treat as high‑risk) LastPass, Dashlane, and Bitwarden” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Password managers · negative prompt · hard negative
“researchers demonstrate repeated failures in confidentiality and integrity protections in their "zero-knowledge encryption" implementations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Password managers · negative prompt · soft negative
“security guarantees by cloud-based password manager software offered by Bitwarden, Dashlane and LastPass aren't as advertised.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Password managers · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bitwarden, over the 226 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bitwarden was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Keeper Security150 of 2267Not among the top eight
Dashlane130 of 2262Not among the top eight
LastPass103 of 2260Not among the top eight
ManageEngine Password Manager Pro17 of 2260Not among the top eight
Proton Pass15 of 2260Not among the top eight
Zoho Vault13 of 2260Not among the top eight
KeePass10 of 2260Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bitwarden. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 206 of the 226 answers that named Bitwarden and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bitwarden.comYour site143
security.org93
blog.lastpass.com88
techrepublic.com88
1password.com87
petronellatech.com74
techradar.com72
selecthub.com64
dashlane.com50
viasocket.com49

665 of the 808 domain citations in answers naming Bitwarden came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

bitwarden.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Bitwarden takes 43% of first choices and 1Password takes 47%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “business password manager”
2
Position for “business password managers”
7
Searches for its name, Google
165,000 a month (“bitwarden”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2,160 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 474,514 a month
Searches its site ranks for
7,137 · 1,221 in the top three
Sites linking to it
22,976
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 12 clicks and $62 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 90 text, 18 video, 12 image · 52 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as BITWARDEN INC., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 20 in the year, 100 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
43%
rank 2 of 35 in password managers
Segment leader
47%
1Password
First choices
65 across its categories
Named in
226 answers
Its own site cited
in 206 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on bitwarden.com
13,992
subdomains included
Content
1,787
counted in the table below
Documentation
717
Product · Integration
37 · 7
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,373162026-09-18
Conference or event305undated
Glossary or explainer2502026-06-18
Comparison24undated
Template or tool20undated
Podcast or video18undated
Report or ebook9undated
News or press7undated
Case study6undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page bitwarden.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Bitwarden

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Bitwarden; a claim can dispute any of them.
Bitwarden Enterprise 18Bitwarden Teams 9Bitwarden Teams/Enterprise 3Bitwarden Business 2Bitwarden (Enterprise Plan) 1Bitwarden (Enterprise) 1Bitwarden (Secrets Manager) 1Bitwarden Business / Enterprise 1Bitwarden Enterprise / Teams 1Bitwarden/Vaultwarden 1

Follow Bitwarden

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Bitwarden is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
the trusted, open source password manager for individuals, teams, and enterprises
For
individuals, teams, and enterprises
Price stated
Free to start. bitwarden.com
Starting price
1.65 bitwarden.com
Free plan or trial
Free to start. bitwarden.com
Certifications
ISO 27001SOC2 Type IISOC3HIPAASOC 2GDPRCCPAData Privacy Framework (DPF) compliant
Hosting
USEU
Customers named
NASARentokil InitialGlovoyellow arrowOLR RetailNamecheapOcrolusCity of Albany, OR
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations

What Bitwarden's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: bitwarden.com, bitwarden.com/pricing, bitwarden.com/compliance, bitwarden.com/products, bitwarden.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bitwarden's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bitwarden, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bitwarden by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Bitwarden is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bitwarden, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bitwarden.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Bitwarden is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

Bitwarden is among the products AI models recommend first in Business password managers this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Business password managers, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/identity/business-password-managers/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/bitwarden--business-password-managers-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Business password managers, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Business password managers standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Business password managers, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/identity/business-password-managers/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/bitwarden--business-password-managers-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Business password managers, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Business password managers standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Business password managers, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/identity/business-password-managers/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/bitwarden--business-password-managers-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Business password managers, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Business password managers standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.