| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business password managers | Identity and access | 0% | 8 of 35 | 18% | 50 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Secrets management | Identity and access | 0% | 42 of 59 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HashiCorp Vault at 31% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Password managers | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 8 of 35 |
| Secrets | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 42 of 59, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Free tools like the free tiers of Dashlane, NordPass... Dashlane Business | User-friendly, strong security features, SSO integration” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Password managers · negative prompt · alternative
“Dashlane Business if your team prioritizes a polished end-user experience and simple deployment.” GPT-5.4 mini · Password managers · direct prompt · alternative
“Top-rated business options without major disclosed breaches include ... and Dashlane Business.” Grok 4.20 · Password managers · negative prompt · alternative
“Dashlane rises to the top for its blend of security, scalability, and admin-friendly tools” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Password managers · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid (or at minimum, treat as high‑risk) LastPass, Dashlane, and Bitwarden” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Password managers · negative prompt · hard negative
“This does not mean Bitwarden or Dashlane are unsafe in all deployments, but researchers advise treating zero-knowledge marketing claims with caution” Muse Glimmer 30B · Password managers · negative prompt · soft negative
“Bitwarden, LastPass, and Dashlane collectively serve over 60 million users, but researchers demonstrate repeated failures” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Password managers · negative prompt · soft negative
“Very polished UX, but admin controls are less granular; better for smaller teams (< 50).” MiniMax M2.5 · Password managers · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 129 of the 141 answers that named Dashlane and are not a share of its labels.
487 of the 531 domain citations in answers naming Dashlane came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 878 | 10 | 2026-09-23 | SIEM, MFA | |
| Case study | 34 | 0 | 2026-06-22 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 17 | 1 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| News or press | 15 | 0 | 2026-05-19 | ||
| Conference or event | 13 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 12 | 0 | 2025-04-03 | ||
| Report or ebook | 10 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 7 | 0 | 2024-04-11 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | undated |
As the event pages on dashlane.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page dashlane.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Dashlane's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: dashlane.com, dashlane.com/pricing, trust.dashlane.com, dashlane.com/product/darkweb, dashlane.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dashlane's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dashlane, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Dashlane by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: