AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Iru · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Named, not ranked

Iru

17Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Iru was named 6 times in UEM and 2 other categories, where Microsoft Intune led with 39%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In uem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Iru for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Unified endpoint managementIT operations and endpoint0%21 of 530%3under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Intune at 39%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Compliance automationSecurity operations0%28 of 670%2under 10 labels · led by Drata at 34%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
GRC platformsSecurity operations0%61 of 75100%1under 10 labels · led by Hyperproof at 19%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Iru held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · UEM · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 17 → 18 of 53
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 24 → 20 of 48

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
UEM0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 24 → 21 of 53
Compliance automation0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 28 of 67, unchanged
GRC0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 61 of 75, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Iru across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000011
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Iru (formerly Kandji) is beautifully designed for modern IT admins.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · UEM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“has become a major mid-market favorite” Gemini 3.5 Flash · UEM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“some mid-tier tools like Iru): Varying implementation quality and support declines post-launch.” Grok 4.20 · GRC · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Iru, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Iru was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Microsoft Intune8 of 175Not among the top eight
JumpCloud6 of 171Not among the top eight
Jamf6 of 170Not among the top eight
Vanta5 of 172Not among the top eight
Drata5 of 170Not among the top eight
NinjaOne4 of 171Not among the top eight
Hexnode UEM4 of 170Not among the top eight
Action13 of 170Not among the top eight
Hyperproof3 of 170Not among the top eight
ManageEngine Endpoint Central3 of 170Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Iru. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Iru and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com9
preyproject.com5
syncrosecure.com5
complyjet.com4
deel.com4
guideflow.com4
learn.g2.com4
venn.com4
action1.com3
capterra.com3

Forty-five of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming Iru came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

iru.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Iru takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Intune takes 39%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “unified endpoint management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “unified endpoint management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 12,579 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,407 · 84 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,829
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 94 text, 15 image, 11 video · 32 shown in the last 30 days

First shown December 2025, as Iru, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 120 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 21 of 53 in UEM
Segment leader
39%
Microsoft Intune
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
17 answers
Its own site cited
in 17 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on iru.com
4,238
subdomains included
Content
509
counted in the table below
Documentation
432
Product · Integration
32 · 132
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog382222026-09-23EDR, Patching
Case study35undated
Comparison3542026-08-19EDR
Glossary or explainer3212026-09-15UEM, Patching
Podcast or video11undated
Conference or event9undated
News or press202025-10-22
Webinar or virtual event102026-03-16
Report or ebook1undated
Template or tool1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page iru.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Iru

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Iru; a claim can dispute any of them.
Iru (formerly Kandji) 2Iru (Kandji) 1Iru / identity-native automation 1

Follow Iru

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Iru is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Manage devices and everything they touch.
For
security, IT, and compliance
Price stated
included for free with all Iru products iru.com/use-cases/mcp
Free plan or trial
free 14-day trial iru.com/pricing
Certifications
2025 Type 2 SOC 2 ReportISO/IEC 42001:2023 AIMS CertificateISO 27001:2022 CertificateSOC 2 Type II attestationISO 27001ISO 42001
Customers named
HuntersVaro BankRackspace TechnologyDemandbaseVICEInnoceanIntruderClimatiq
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, hosting

What Iru's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: iru.com, iru.com/pricing, trust.iru.com, iru.com/use-cases/mcp, iru.com/resources/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Iru's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Iru, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Iru by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Iru is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Iru, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at iru.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.