Index › Products › Freshworks Freddy AI · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Freshworks Freddy AI

4Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

4 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Freshworks Freddy AI was named 3 times in AI IT agents, where Freshservice with Freddy AI led with 11%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market41 of 121

under the label threshold

Enterprise54 of 115

under the label threshold

In ai it agents · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Freshworks Freddy AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI IT support agents	IT operations and endpoint	0%	41 of 121	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Freshservice with Freddy AI at 11%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Freshworks Freddy AI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Freshworks Freddy AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“best for SMBs and mid-market teams already on Freshworks that want AI across both sales and support without a massive budget” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI IT agents · budget prompt · alternative

“Freshworks Freddy AI is the safer predictable-cost option” Perplexity Sonar · AI IT agents · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Freshworks Freddy AI, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Freshworks Freddy AI was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Intercom Fin3 of 41Not among the top eight

ServiceNow Now Assist2 of 40Not among the top eight

Zendesk AI Agents2 of 40Not among the top eight

Aisera1 of 41Not among the top eight

Make1 of 41Not among the top eight

Moveworks1 of 41Not among the top eight

Aisera Agent Assist1 of 40Not among the top eight

Askyura1 of 40Not among the top eight

BMC Helix1 of 40Not among the top eight

Freshdesk1 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Freshworks Freddy AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Freshworks Freddy AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

eesel.ai3

agentiveaiq.com2

chatbot.com2

enjo.ai2

microsoft.com2

moxo.com2

zendesk.com2

adoption.microsoft.com1

ai.g2.com1

aiintelreport.com1

No domain is on file for Freshworks Freddy AI, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

agentiveaiq.com/listicles/best-5-smart-ai-agents-for-internal-it-support2

chatbot.com/blog/best-ai-agents2

microsoft.com/en-us/copilot/solutions/business2

moxo.com/blog/best-ai-agents2

zendesk.com/service/ai/customer-service-agents2

zendesk.com/service/ai/top-ai-agents2

adoption.microsoft.com/en-us/scenario-library/information-technology1

agentiveaiq.com/listicles/best-7-smart-ai-agents-for-it-support-services-msps1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Freshworks Freddy AI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Freshworks Freddy AI; a claim can dispute any of them.

Freshdesk/Freshworks Freddy AI 1

Follow Freshworks Freddy AI

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Freshworks Freddy AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Freshworks Freddy AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Freshworks Freddy AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Freshworks Freddy AI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Freshworks Freddy AI, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.