Every category where a model named Firebase Crashlytics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Error and crash monitoring	Developer platform	0%	11 of 42	0%	12	accepted challenger	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Firebase Crashlytics held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Error monitoring · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 12 of 36

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 10 of 39

Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 18 of 47

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Error monitoring	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 12 → 11 of 42

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Firebase Crashlytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	2
Grok 4.20	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	2
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“use lightweight, mobile-first alternatives like Firebase Crashlytics for standard mobile applications” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Error monitoring · negative prompt · alternative

“Firebase Crashlytics is a free tool with real-time monitoring and seamless Firebase integration” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Error monitoring · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“best for free crash reporting for mobile, with no cost and tight fit for Android and iOS teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Error monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative

“If your company is mobile-first, Firebase Crashlytics is a strong alternative” Perplexity Sonar · Error monitoring · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Firebase Crashlytics, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Firebase Crashlytics was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Sentry19 of 1913Not among the top eight

Bugsnag10 of 191Not among the top eight

Rollbar9 of 191Not among the top eight

GlitchTip7 of 190Not among the top eight

Honeybadger6 of 191Not among the top eight

Datadog Error Tracking6 of 190Not among the top eight

Raygun5 of 191Not among the top eight

LogRocket5 of 190Not among the top eight

New Relic Errors Inbox5 of 190Not among the top eight

PostHog4 of 191Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Firebase Crashlytics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 19 answers that named Firebase Crashlytics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com11

ones.com11

dupple.com8

scoutapm.com8

saucelabs.com7

betterstack.com6

g2.com6

firebase.google.comYour site5

sentry.io5

uxcam.com5

Sixty-seven of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming Firebase Crashlytics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/error-monitoring-software11

dupple.com/learn/best-error-tracking-software8

ones.com/blog/error-reporting-software-comparison-8-tools-worth-trying7

saucelabs.com/resources/blog/the-best-error-reporting-and-crash-monitoring-tools-of-20267

scoutapm.com/blog/best-error-monitoring-tools6

firebase.google.com/products/crashlytics5

ones.com/blog/top-9-error-tracking-tools-that-catch-bugs-before-users-do5

betterstack.com/community/comparisons/error-tracking-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

firebase.google.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Firebase Crashlytics takes 0% of first choices and Sentry takes 76%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “error monitoring tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “error monitoring tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 480 a month (“firebase crashlytics”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 29 a month
Its company's site: firebase.google.com shared with Firebase's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site: about 91,247 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,648 · 1,242 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 74,278
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 11 of 42 in error monitoring

Segment leader

76%

Sentry

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 19 answers
Its own site cited: in 18 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Firebase Crashlytics

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Firebase is the company behind Firebase Crashlytics.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Firebase: Firebase / Cloud Firestore, Firebase Authentication, Firebase Realtime Database, Firebase Remote Config

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Firebase Crashlytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Firebase Crashlytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Firebase Crashlytics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Firebase Crashlytics is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Firebase Crashlytics, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.