IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Firebase Crashlytics · September 2026 Edition

Firebase · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Firebase Crashlytics

12Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Firebase Crashlytics was named 4 times in Error monitoring, where Sentry led with 82%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business11 of 37

under the label threshold

Mid-market12 of 44

under the label threshold

Enterprise14 of 45

under the label threshold

In error monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Firebase Crashlytics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Error and crash monitoring	Developer platform	0%	12 of 44	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Sentry at 82%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Firebase Crashlytics yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Firebase Crashlytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase9 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If your company is mobile-only or strongly mobile-first, Firebase Crashlytics is the better fit” Perplexity Sonar · Error monitoring · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“if you are heavily invested in Google's ecosystem, Firebase Crashlytics is a strong alternative” Mistral Small · Error monitoring · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Firebase Crashlytics, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Firebase Crashlytics was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Sentry10 of 128Not in the top three

Bugsnag7 of 120Not in the top three

Rollbar7 of 120Not in the top three

Datadog4 of 120Not in the top three

Honeybadger2 of 120Not in the top three

Raygun2 of 120Not in the top three

Airbrake1 of 120Not in the top three

BugSplat1 of 120Not in the top three

Datadog Error Tracking1 of 120Not in the top three

GlitchTip1 of 120Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Firebase Crashlytics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Firebase Crashlytics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

saucelabs.com10

firebase.google.com9

guideflow.com7

dupple.com5

g2.com5

toolradar.com5

gitnux.org4

sentry.io4

featuredcustomers.com3

ones.com3

Fifty-five of the fifty-five domain citations in answers naming Firebase Crashlytics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

saucelabs.com/resources/blog/the-best-error-reporting-and-crash-monitoring-tools-of-202610

firebase.google.com/products/crashlytics9

guideflow.com/blog/error-monitoring-software7

g2.com/categories/mobile-crash-reporting/small-business4

gitnux.org/best/crash-report-software4

toolradar.com/guides/best-crash-reporting-tools4

dupple.com/learn/best-crash-reporting-tools3

featuredcustomers.com/software/error-monitoring-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Firebase Crashlytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Firebase Crashlytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at firebase.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.