| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error and crash monitoring | Developer platform | 14% | 2 of 44 | 13% | 63 | accepted challenger |
| Application performance monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 55 of 70 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 54% |
| Incident management and on-call | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 29 of 53 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by incident.io at 25% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Rollbar: Offers a free plan with 5,000 occurrences and 1,000 session replays a month, with real-time alerts, intelligent grouping” Llama 4 Maverick · Error monitoring · budget prompt · first choice
“the two strongest recommendations are Sentry and Rollbar” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Error monitoring · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Sentry or Rollbar typically emerge as the top choices” Kimi K2 · Error monitoring · scale prompt · first choice
“Best overall for most mid-market B2B companies: Rollbar” Mistral Small · Error monitoring · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“avoid SaaS-only tools like Rollbar” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Error monitoring · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools like Sentry, Rollbar, Bugsnag, Datadog, and New Relic are US-incorporated and subject to the CLOUD Act” Kimi K2 · Error monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
“Even industry leaders like Sentry and Rollbar have been criticized for this pricing model at scale.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Error monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tiered per-event billing forces upgrades or charges overages; "sticker shock" during bursts common.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Error monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 125 of the 167 answers that named Rollbar and are not a share of its labels.
400 of the 481 domain citations in answers naming Rollbar came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rollbar's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rollbar, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at rollbar.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.