Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 4 → 5 of 36
1 category · RankedRollbar
172Judge labels
12First choices
18Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
16% in Error monitoring for enterprise buyers
Rank 2 of 42 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 56 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Rollbar →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business5 of 36
2%58 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market2 of 42
8%56 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise2 of 48
16%55 labels
accepted challenger
In error monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Rollbar for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error and crash monitoring | Developer platform | 8% | 2 of 42 | 5% | 56 | accepted challenger | ▼−7Since September 2026: 14% → 7%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Rollbar held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Error monitoring · by segment
Mid-market▼−7Since September 2026: 14% → 7%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 14% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 2 of 39, unchanged
Enterprise▲+10Since September 2026: 7% → 16%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
16%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 1 pointRank 3 → 2 of 47
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error monitoring | 14% | 7% | ▼−7Since September 2026: 14% → 7%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 of 42, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Rollbar across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Rollbar across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct30 labels4
Paraphrase21 labelsNone
Comparative40 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained30 labels7
Scale-constrained27 labels1
Negative24 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative172 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you prioritize developer velocity and automated fixing/ticketing without building custom workflows yourself, choose Rollbar.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Error monitoring · scale prompt · first choice
“the best error monitoring tools are generally considered to be Rollbar and Scout Monitoring” Mistral Small · Error monitoring · direct prompt · first choice
“"the best error monitoring tools for a mid-market B2B company are Rollbar and Scout Monitoring"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Error monitoring · direct prompt · first choice
“Better Alternative: Use Sentry or Rollbar which capture the actual crash code.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Error monitoring · negative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Similar event-based pricing; free tiers cap at 5K... Custom pricing for high use makes forecasting hard.” Grok 4.20 · Error monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
“Rollbar if you have strict retention requirements, unless you verify the plan's retention settings.” GPT-6 Luna · Error monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution: Noise, grouping issues, & API instability” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Error monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Rollbar, over the 172 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rollbar was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Rollbar, over the 172 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rollbar was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rollbar. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 154 of the 172 answers that named Rollbar and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ones.com93
dupple.com83
guideflow.com67
rollbar.comYour site64
sentry.io54
citehawk.com45
zipdo.co45
cubeapm.com40
toolradar.com38
devopsschool.com35
500 of the 564 domain citations in answers naming Rollbar came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
rollbar.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Rollbar takes 8% of first choices and Sentry takes 76%.ShowHide
Search and answers
rollbar.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Rollbar takes 8% of first choices and Sentry takes 76%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “error monitoring tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “error monitoring tools”
5
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“rollbar”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 175 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 12,382 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,239 · 214 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,873
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
8%
rank 2 of 42 in error monitoring
Segment leader
76%
Sentry
- First choices
- 12 across its categories
- Named in
- 172 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 154 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on rollbar.com
1,213
subdomains included
Content
569
counted in the table below
Documentation
607
Product · Integration
1 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 498 | 7 | 2026-09-28 | APM, AI coding | |
| Report or ebook | 31 | 0 | 2025-11-28 | ||
| Comparison | 26 | 6 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| News or press | 9 | 0 | 2022-07-12 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 0 | 2026-03-31 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Ruby frameworks blog
- 2026-09-28Python frontend frameworks blog
- 2026-09-28With agent automation nobody has to start root cause analysis by hand blog
- 2026-09-22Sentry comparison
- 2026-09-22Bugsnag comparison
- 2026-09-17Beta acids story with rollbar blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page rollbar.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Rollbar
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Rollbar is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Rollbar is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- code-first observability platform for software teams
- For
- software teams
- Price stated
- Plans starting at $0. Get a 14-day free trial to see how Rollbar fits your workflow. rollbar.com
- Starting price
- 0 rollbar.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free plan available. Paid plans starting at $0 with 14-day trial. rollbar.com
- Integrations claimed
- 40 rollbar.com/integrations
- Certifications
- SOC2 & ISO27001 certifiedGDPR complianceStandard BAA for HIPAACustom BAA for HIPAASOC 2 Type IISOC 3SOC2 & ISO27001
- Hosting
- across regions
- Customers named
- TalihoBookberry ClubRELENTLESS Venture Studio
What Rollbar's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: rollbar.com, rollbar.com/pricing, rollbar.com/blog/category/company/security, rollbar.com/platform, rollbar.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rollbar's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rollbar, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Rollbar by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Rollbar is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Rollbar, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Rollbar is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Rollbar is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideRollbar is among the products AI models recommend first in Error and crash monitoring this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.