Small business=heldSince September 2026: 5% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 3 → 4 of 36
1 category · RankedGlitchTip
67Judge labels
3First choices
6Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Error monitoring for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 42 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 23 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of GlitchTip →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 36
4%33 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 42
2%23 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise15 of 48
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
In error monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named GlitchTip for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error and crash monitoring | Developer platform | 2% | 4 of 42 | 9% | 23 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, GlitchTip held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Error monitoring · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 3 → 4 of 39
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 9 → 19 of 47
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error monitoring | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 4 of 42 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated GlitchTip across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated GlitchTip across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained24 labels3
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative17 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative67 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Safer Alternatives to Consider - GlitchTip/Bugsink: Open-source, Sentry-compatible, self-hostable” Kimi K2 · Error monitoring · negative prompt · first choice
“choose GlitchTip for the tightest budget” GPT-5.4 mini · Error monitoring · budget prompt · first choice
“Option A: GlitchTip (The Balanced Choice)... Teams that want Sentry-like capabilities on a shoestring budget” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Error monitoring · budget prompt · alternative
“An open-source, Sentry-compatible option that can be self-hosted, making it a very budget-friendly choice” Mistral Small · Error monitoring · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“save money on licensing but require significant engineering hours to maintain” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Error monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
“Self-hosted options, such as GlitchTip, if nobody will own operations.” GPT-6 Luna · Error monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as GlitchTip, over the 67 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GlitchTip was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as GlitchTip, over the 67 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GlitchTip was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GlitchTip. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 66 of the 67 answers that named GlitchTip and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ones.com48
dupple.com39
guideflow.com30
toolradar.com24
rollbar.com22
sentry.io22
scoutapm.com21
citehawk.com18
glitchtip.comYour site17
betterstack.com16
240 of the 257 domain citations in answers naming GlitchTip came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
glitchtip.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, GlitchTip takes 2% of first choices and Sentry takes 76%.ShowHide
Search and answers
glitchtip.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, GlitchTip takes 2% of first choices and Sentry takes 76%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “error monitoring tool”
8
Position for “error monitoring tools”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“glitchtip”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 9 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 250 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 129 · 4 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 725
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 4 of 42 in error monitoring
Segment leader
76%
Sentry
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 67 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 66 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on glitchtip.com
51
subdomains included
Content
44
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 44 | 0 | 2026-06-22 |
Most recent
- 2026-06-222026 06 22 glitchtip 6 2 released blog
- 2026-04-202026 04 20 duckdb parquet archives blog
- 2026-04-132026 04 13 django vtasks blog
- 2026-04-022026 04 02 django vcache blog
- 2026-03-272026 03 27 mcp blog
- 2026-03-232026 03 23 glitchtip 6 1 released blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page glitchtip.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as GlitchTip
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as GlitchTip; a claim can dispute any of them.
GlitchTip/Bugsink 1Glitchtip 1
Follow GlitchTip
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
GlitchTip is its own company.ShowHide
The company
GlitchTip is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Simple, open source error tracking
- Price stated
- Free; Small — $15 / month; Medium — $50 / month; Large — $250 / month glitchtip.com
- Starting price
- Free ($0) glitchtip.com
- Free plan or trial
- Try GlitchTip for free glitchtip.com
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What GlitchTip's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: glitchtip.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GlitchTip's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GlitchTip, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for GlitchTip by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where GlitchTip is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name GlitchTip, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.